Deepseek Uses Banned Nvidia Chips for AI Model, Report Says
Posted23 days agoActive21 days ago
finance.yahoo.comNewsstoryHigh profile
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
Artificial IntelligenceGovernment ControlNvidia
Key topics
Artificial Intelligence
Government Control
Nvidia
(Original is https://www.theinformation.com/articles/deepseek-using-banne... but hardwalled)
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
20m
Peak period
123
0-3h
Avg / period
16
Comment distribution160 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 160 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 10, 2025 at 11:34 AM EST
23 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 10, 2025 at 11:55 AM EST
20m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
123 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 12, 2025 at 11:56 AM EST
21 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 46219853Type: storyLast synced: 12/13/2025, 4:25:17 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
and forcing them to allow opium to be sold in their country
and forcing them to give up major port cities and open up trade against their wishes
Honestly whenever China gets around to getting its served-extremely-cold revenge for all the savagery committed against it in the 19th and 20th centuries, some chips are going to be the least of everyone's problems.
This is what living in the ashes of an empire does to you.
Will come for the USA in time.
The Chinese government has done more for less so I wouldn't be so certain.
What realistically could happen? Nvidia is already prohibited from selling their GPUs to China, I guess if you wanted it to really stop, you'd need to prohibit Nvidia from selling GPUs in any other country but the US, and require some sort of government controlled license to be able to buy it inside the US. Neither of which sound like realistic options.
So what could anyone really do, to "solve" this "problem"?
You log into the Nvidia Enterprise Portal and download a license file that is temporary valid (e.g. 7 days).
You transfer that file to your local license (DLS) server.
It does not need to be permanently connected to the internet, but it needs to be refreshed periodically.
Your local server now holds the tickets that the GPUs need to use to run.
https://docs.nvidia.com/license-system/dls/index.html
If an account is suspected of violation, they get suspended and need to pass the KYC again.
American Imperialism is European Imperialism 2.0.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H3xQaf7BFI
Edit: just for fun (and actual neighbor of China), tried Ebay India too, seems not-impossible: https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=blackwell+gpu&_sacat=0&...
Eh, you'd have to cross the Himalayas and go through what is kind of a military zone.
Kazakhstan and Vietnam are more suitable candidates, but neither has actually good infrastructure connectivity to China.
So my 4090 (24 GB) is probably going to get turned into a 48/96 GB VRAM frankenstein in a Chinese chop shop. I haven't watched the full 3.5 hour documentary you linked but from the first few minutes, it seems quite interesting. And covers this exact thing.
I would like to point out that in Australia and NZ, it can be a massive pain to find someone who will ship internationally.
Normally this is for things like Amazon US, and other US-based companies. There are services[1] that advertise virtual postal addresses in your purchase-country where they’ll box and ship it to you.
So yes, a Chinese name based in Australia with a shipping address in the US isn’t immediately a red flag. Lots of Chinese in Australia and NZ, and lots of people here like to use shipping services like this.
1. https://www.nzpost.co.nz/tools/you-shop
And a good thing, too, or I would be concerned about posting that I knew it was going somewhere forbidden.
Is it safe to transact with people who use freight forwarders in your experience? Do you lose any protections?
Out of fear, in my cases, I cancelled the auctions.
On second thought though, I wonder if it's actually the buyer using the service that is more at risk (introduction of 3rd party, more complex delivery, probably impossible to return, etc)
Cool, though. Where can I buy one? :p
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/china-blocks-sal...
> The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) told companies, including ByteDance and Alibaba, this week to end their testing and orders of the RTX Pro 6000D, Nvidia’s tailor-made product for the country, according to three people with knowledge of the matter
We have someone in the comments section talking about how they encountered a bunch of suspicious bidders on their GPU auction. That's not what happens when people care about being potentially investigated for breaking export rules.
A person with a Chinese name living in Delaware? Gasp.
This discussion where China is always purely dishonest, bad etc. without any context is honestly lame.
The Chinese ban is largely a political move designed to signal that they're not going to be pushed around.
I'm seeing it more as buying time thing. In sourcing as much as possible in the EU is already in progress, as well as various trade agreements with different countries and economic blocs. That doesn't mean it isn't preferable to play nice with the demented guy to make the transition less painful in the short term.
On diplomatic trips, it often 'lectures' others, rather than listens. I think the EU is less and less liked by these other countries too, which is a disastrous combination when coupled with where the US is at imo.
Like when?
This is not good diplomacy.
> Guo noted that the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression was an important part of the World Anti-Fascist War. 80 years ago, the Chinese people made tremendous national sacrifices to save human civilization
Lol, that particular part is hilarious. Imperial Japan wasn't drastically different in terms of governance compared to Chiang's or Mao's China. All three were pretty brutal anti-democratic regimes. Chiang had pretty clear fascist inspirations too.
> showed a lack of basic historical knowledge
Indeed, Chinese propaganda doesn't concern itself with historical knowledge. Those are the same people who imagine claims to half of Southeast Asia.
But China is a bit like Russia, their foreign minister blabbers nonsense, but that doesn't prevent actual trade or deal making.
Imperial Japan being considered fascist is also quite the stretch. And importantly, neither of the two/myriad of Chinese entities was fighting "to preserve human civilisation". When they were fighting the Japanese for a change, it was because the Japanese were attacking them.
The article tries to position China as some "was fighting for good in WW2 so it's unfair to say current China is autocratic with it's buddies in NK and Russia". Even if it were true thay China was fighting for a good cause in WW2 (extremely debatable), doesn't in the slightest change the fact that today, China is an autocratic regime. How long is Xi's term? How long has he been in power? For how long will he be in power? It's the same story as Putin.
China's foreign minister might bitch about it all he wants, it's nothing but the truth.
acting like china wouldn't doing the same thing to other country if they ever weld such position
every great power would do the same thing to defend their position, its not unique to the US. only because current incumbent power is we see things this way
If that's the mentality, then what's worth fighting over? We should give up because we don't even deserve the rewards.
its not make the world worse but simply take what matters to your group
does that evil??? hmmm noo, people call it patriotism
what do you think entire US military base reside in 80% of the world btw????? does US military doing picnic on these country?????
I can tell you answer but some people didn't want to confront reality and would be downvote me to hell
but in the end someone gotta to do it
if china was in the same position as the us it would just be the us; obviously this is not inherent to nationality, but material conditions
But let's not pretend China doesn't use their influence to keep other countries down as well, and let's not pretend they allow a fair playing field for foreign competitors domestically either.
The US would not have imposed these targeted sanctions if China simply wanted to fairly compete in the marketplace.
But the "banned" chips this article is referring to and the original chips act is from the Biden administration, having nothing to do with the current tariff climate.
Also, obviously US actions have nothing to do with free market maximalism. Nor does China feel that way either. Which is my point.
Total historical illiteracy. if only there was an island nation immediately southeast of the US we could look to for information on how America treats countries that try the whole "back off" thing
Sanctioned goods could be used to spread propaganda though, imagine, for example, if installing a NVIDIA GPU driver required answering questions about Tiananmen square incident.
[0] https://www.history.com/articles/iran-contra-affair#Oliver-N...
[1] https://www.cnn.com/US/9811/03/cia.drugs/
Not to discount how negative free speech restrictions are, but I’m not so sure how effective that particular propaganda campaign would be.
But if you post about it on Weibo, it will absolutely get removed and you might get the local police visiting you -- depending on how much time they have on their hands and how incendiary your post was.
Probably true. Right up to the point where they attract a little too much attention, or annoy the wrong party official. Then all that they said becomes evidence of their crimes.
The irony is that the west removed the incentive for China to respect IP laws. Well done USA.
Unlike your typical free market fanboy, the Chinese leadership isn't stupid. They were always planning to do that, sanctions or no.
Realistically, all sanctions can do is mess with their timelines for some temporary strategic advantage, slowing some things down and forcing reallocation of investment away from other areas into the sanctioned areas.
It's ridiculous to think they won't succeed, just by dint of sheer numbers alone.
The plans weren't wishes, they were things they were actively working on to make happen. The point is they didn't need "Trump's erratic and corrupt trade policy" to motivate it, they were already motivated to do it anyway.
Yes, they were "actively working on it"; no, they had made little significant progress despite throwing tons of money at the initiative.
There were lots of stories along the lines of https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/19/technology/china-microchi... from the early 2020s, not so many lately. Their internal posture will now be the same as Russia's post-1945 push for the Bomb. Continued failure will (possibly literally) place heads at stake.
That's how things sometimes go when you're building up a capability. I'm sure they were going to work through the setbacks, regardless.
>> The US's problem is that its actions are uncoordinated.
> They are coordinated well enough, but with the goal of magnifying Cheeto Benito's personal influence and cultivating his in-group's fortunes.
No. That problem is bigger than the Trump administrations, focusing on him is lazy.
It's absurd to say that without elaborating on how anyone else was "just as bad," which I expect will be a key part of your next reply.
Trump is fucking bad, and if you disagree after all we've seen, you're either arguing in bad faith, or you're not such a great person yourself. He is costing us every jot and tittle of soft power we ever wielded as a nation.
> Trump is fucking bad, and if you disagree after all we've seen, you're either arguing in bad faith, or you're not such a great person yourself. He is costing us every jot and tittle of soft power we ever wielded as a nation.
Sorry dude, all of that is coming from inside your own head. You're so blinded by Trump that you're incapable of having this conversation.
I don't want to put in the effort to try to fix that. Have a nice day.
Competition's software stack have to be good enough that it is worth migrating over and I think till we get some kind of cross vendor API for that it won't happen for a while
Shortly thereafter people realized they were probably just evading sanctions and ~stealing~ bootstrapping parameters from other models to reach their stated training cost. This report is just further reporting on that rumor.
There is nothing stopping some intermediary from buying them from a non-sanctioned country, and then reselling them to Chinese people. I don’t even think any laws would be broken in that case.
I've rented H100s no problem on American servers and there's no KYC or anything, they let anybody do it.
US authorities are ok with Chinese companies accessing GPUs in overseas DCs because those DCs will still be subject any US export controls. Right now, we don’t really care if Chinese companies are building tier-2 LLMs on US gear. If China invades Taiwan or frontier models approach AGI, we will shut down those Malaysian and Thai data centers overnight.
You’re mistaking them for the FBI. CIA has destabilized entire countries.
Sounds straight out of sci-fi.
[0]: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/9/17/china-bans-tech-...
nvidia is facing a lot of competitive threats and their moat is being filled in. Google with their Ironwood TPU. Amazon with Trainium3. Even Apple is adding tensor cores to their chips, and if Apple went big scale it would be legitimate in the space as well.
We know that China has a number of upstart TPU vendors, and Huawei has built some "better than H200" solutions with a roadmap to much higher heights.
So there is suddenly a bunch of secret-source reports that no, China actually is totally reliant on nvidia. nvidia needs this to be true, or at least people to believe it to be true.
I mean, after all the fanfare about the H200 being allowed to be exported, nvidia shares...dropped. The market doesn't seem to be buying the China reliance bluster.
155 more comments available on Hacker News