Debugging Humidity: Lessons From Deploying Software in the Physical World
Key topics
The author shares lessons learned from deploying software in a factory environment, highlighting the challenges of debugging physical systems and the importance of considering environmental factors like humidity. The discussion revolves around the complexities of working with industrial equipment and the need for robust testing and monitoring.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
10m
Peak period
7
108-120h
Avg / period
3.5
Based on 14 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 10, 2025 at 4:04 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 10, 2025 at 4:14 PM EDT
10m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 108-120h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 15, 2025 at 2:25 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The title was actually inspired by a real incident where a device kept failing every afternoon. We eventually realized that condensation from the facility's massive air conditioning unit was dripping onto the enclosure right above the SoC. We were, quite literally, debugging the effects of humidity. I should have included that story in the post itself.
I feel this blog post hard.
Indeed. That's why it's important to send your engineers along with the sales folks to these sites. If anything just to get a perspective on things like that.
> The first time I deployed code to an actual factory floor, I learned that "edge compute" doesn’t live in climate-controlled racks. It lives next to dust, grease, and forklifts.
And bugs, real ones not just nice abstract software ones. So you may find yourself debugging spider webs and ants crawling around, which always makes for great puns and stories.
> Now, imagine your request is actuator.rotate(90).
a good example of something that is not idempotent? As it is based on its current position. Actually idempotent would be: `actuator.rotateTo(Degrees(90))` with a predefined frame of reference, or a frame of reference that you can include in the request.
Like the difference between a servomotor vs stepper motor.
I used the simpler, non-idempotent rotate(90) example intentionally to illustrate the default trap. How a pure software mindset can dangerously oversimplify a physical action.