'dangerous Design Choices' Trapped Teens in Cybertruck Crash, Lawsuit Claims
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
oaklandside.orgTechstory
heatednegative
Debate
60/100
TeslaCybertruckAutomotive Safety
Key topics
Tesla
Cybertruck
Automotive Safety
A lawsuit claims that design choices in Tesla's Cybertruck trapped two teenagers in a crash, sparking debate about the vehicle's safety features and design priorities.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
3
11-12h
Avg / period
1.6
Comment distribution11 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 11 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 18, 2025 at 7:14 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 18, 2025 at 9:11 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 11-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 19, 2025 at 9:59 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45631043Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:24:16 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Hole #1 grandpa lets teenage grandson take cybertruck out for a night with friends
Hole #2 kid driver gets rip-roaring drunk
Hole #3 other kids get in the car with drunk driver
Hole #4 drunk kid drives cybertruck into a concrete wall
Hole #5 Tesla makes manual door releases hard to find.
All those thing lined up for those kids. Any one of them could have been a point where doing something different prevents this outcome.
But we have those rear seat "child safety" locks that could have had the same effect.
And you can't always prevent someone from doing something fatally stupid.
Then whether or not you select the additional option of electric door locks, the mechanical everyday handles remain the primary way each driver or passenger gets in and out most of the time.
So that type of familiarity could always be taken for granted, if someone has gotten in and out at least once, they have historically almost always been familiar with the mechanical handles to an extent just doing so.
And these type of victims had probably never had a chance to have even routinely gotten out of a Cybertruck for their first time, since the vehicle itself is still not very common.
For that reason the mechanical handles need to be not just the primary method of egress, but more prominent than average to make up the difference. Especially from the inside, and like the best-established motor companies have done, the electric locks are "simply" an augmented version of the underlying mechanical ones which remain in place and functional not just for nostalgic reasons.
Automatic windows and electric locks go together in ways that you really have to think about if you're going to match those who started decades earlier. Maybe that's why so many copied each other except for rare situations like this.
Good thing the vehicle is basically illegal in Europe.
Perhaps we should all acknowledge that part out loud and prioritize making the manual release easy to find when you’re clawing desperately at the door as you burn to death.
Actually I see little reason why unlocking doors and holding them unlocked should not be mandatory in crash. On average that must be the preferable outcome.
Changes should be considered and evaluated very carefully, particularly where user safety is concerned.
Tesla has failed to do this and has boldly "fixed" some things that didn't need fixing in my opinion.
An obvious example is door latches. Exiting the vehicle under duress should be as intuitive as possible without written instructions. Expecting passengers to read the manual beforehand is simply absurd and indicative of a basic design failure.
Another is moving basic driving feedback info (like speed and range) out of the driver's typical line of sight.
But one of the most egregious is mis-labeling driver assistance as "Full Self Driving" which even they admit is purely aspirational at this point.
Will Tesla robots be labeled "Sentient" when they clearly are not?