Corruption: When Norms Upstage the Law
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
knowablemagazine.orgResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
10/100
CorruptionSocial NormsSociology
Key topics
Corruption
Social Norms
Sociology
The article explores how social norms can influence and enable corruption, highlighting the complex interplay between norms and laws; the discussion touches on the challenges of addressing corruption in different cultural contexts.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
2
2-3h
Avg / period
1.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 8, 2025 at 10:26 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 9, 2025 at 12:40 AM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 2-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 9, 2025 at 3:55 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45522855Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:32:26 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
And then later it says an example of a success story is Rwanda, which "tied anti-corruption to national identity through campaigns, while backing it with strict audits and high-profile prosecutions". That sounds like enforcement to me. . .
The idea of informing people that corruption is less widespread than they think seems like a rather weak approach to me. What if it's actually more widespread than they think? Does that mean it's then okay to do more of it?
This isn't to say that social expectations don't matter, but to me a basic characteristic of law is that it's prescriptive rather than descriptive, and a basic characteristic of ethics is that how things should be is a separate question from how things are (oughts aren't ises). Part of what it means to make a change is to make a commitment to do something because you believe it is what you should do, even if it is not how other people do things and isn't what would be easiest.
Speaking as southern European, where we also have our social differences between what the law says and what everyone does, when those trying to enforce are the first ones to show corruption pays off, it is kind of hard to have the population do otherwise.
Some examples of our dear politicians, those that would be the enforcement.
https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/operation-marquis-portuga...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/24/portuguese-pol...
https://poortugalscum.com/isaltino-the-corrupt-mayor-that-th...
I have plenty to give from our beloved goverments in case you want more.
It has 'worked' (for centuries--especially in finance & export sector below 'ministerial level'), but recently there has been a renewed focus on formalizing policy due to some 'scandals'
https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/switzerland-must-improve...
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/revolving-doors_swiss-...
(Imho revolving doors are a pillar of a functional state, so the analogous (single-design-multiple-rotor) Jesus pin must be analyzed through a policy lens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_nut)