Connecticut Trail Census Dashboard (2025)
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
experience.arcgis.comOtherstory
supportivepositive
Debate
20/100
Data VisualizationEnvironmental MonitoringGovernment Data
Key topics
Data Visualization
Environmental Monitoring
Government Data
The Connecticut Trail Census Dashboard is a new interactive data visualization tool showcasing trail usage and demographics, sparking discussion around data collection and environmental impact.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
4
72-78h
Avg / period
2.7
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 2, 2025 at 8:08 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 5, 2025 at 5:39 PM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
4 comments in 72-78h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 6, 2025 at 6:20 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45457143Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:41:30 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
[0] (basically)
CT’s absolutely covered in hiking trails, it’s crazy, you see pull-offs and road crossings constantly. State parks, state wilderness, and just about every town (equivalent of a county in other places; CT has counties, technically, but they don’t do anything, and CT “towns” can have multiple “villages” in them) has a land trust that manages even more wild areas, trails, and parks.
Wildlife includes black bears and moose(!)
Outside the little panhandle bit that’s basically one big NYC suburb, it’s a surprisingly forested state, and feels far more wild than lots of states that have lower population density but are covered in farms. CT farms tend to be isolated, not one butting up against another for miles and miles.
The northeastern quadrant is kinda dull but the rest of the state (the bit nearest NYC excepted) is really pretty. Very hilly, lots of trees, and the whole western third or so is a highland that’s an extension of the Appalachians. Follow that up a little ways, or a bit west, and you’re in proper mountains in MA or NY.
Also, the whole state’s the size of some “greater metro areas” for cities, so you can go from the beach to highland hiking in a day. California lite.
There are trails in state parks (think Kent Falls and Sleeping Giant, for instance). And there are also a lot of maps, interactive whatevers, such as https://ctwoodlands.org/explore-trails/interactive-map/ and Rails to Trail https://www.depdata.ct.gov/maps/ctrailtrail/index.html.
Someone else mentioned how fab it is that the state has done this. But it's unclear to me if the state did this or the University of Connecticut did this. Yes, UConn is the state, but UConn does not manage the open data portal for the state (ct.gov). As someone who worked on open data (and i use "worked on" VERY loosely) in the District of Columbia, I would expect the state (ct.gov) to manage the data and the front end. This is not the case.
Finally, while I want to push back about the portrayal of northeastern CT, I cannot. It was a great place to grow up, close and far.
I do love hiking NY and CT; verdant and accessible. Tons of towns have public parks and trails. We have amazing coastline hikes although many towns control access. (Michael Moore stormed Greenwich Point years before he stormed Gitmo). We also see the beauty of four seasons — colors just started changing.
I’m excited to see CT doing this data acquisition and visualization. I’ve only discovered CT’s dedication to open datasets (data.ct.gov) earlier this year and connected wrapped some of it with MCP.