Commission Fines X €120m Under the Digital Services Act
Posted29 days agoActive26 days ago
ec.europa.euNewsstory
informativeneutral
Debate
60/100
Digital Services ActGovernment ControlOnline Safety
Key topics
Digital Services Act
Government Control
Online Safety
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2m
Peak period
5
0-6h
Avg / period
3.7
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 5, 2025 at 7:07 AM EST
29 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 5, 2025 at 7:10 AM EST
2m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 7, 2025 at 10:54 AM EST
26 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 46160196Type: storyLast synced: 12/5/2025, 12:20:11 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Caveat emptor. Sounds like the EU wants to push privacy-invading KYC requirements.
> … and the failure to provide access to public data for researchers.
That’s a wild thing to try to force a company to do with our data. And I deeply suspect they’d use that data to justify more reasons to engage in regulatory lawfare against sites like X.
The entire complaint reads as remarkably invasive. I think it’s time for the US to put the EU back in its place. How about we withhold $X*100 dollars in NATO spending for every $X dollars they fine a US company under laws like this.
It’s a politically charged subject, and I’m taking a polarizing, US-centric, anti-regulatory position towards free speech, on top of my suggestion of using NATO funding as leverage to advance US speech policy.
Plus, a lot of people feel a great deal of partisan ill-will towards X and Elon Musk, irrespective of any of these issues.
No, X wants to do that, or at least wants the benefit of pretending to offer it without the respondibility. Historically twitter offered blue checkmarks, now they offer it without verifying, simple as, it's a scam
Now they offer blue checkmarks basically meaning “this person has a paid subscription and is probably human”.
Where’s the scam?
Here is an account I just found, it fakes being the ex president of Argentina.
It has a blue check mark, the name is that of the president, it has his picture, and in tweets it appears as if it were him.
> You may not impersonate other identities of individuals, groups, or organizations to deceive others. Although you are not required to display your real identity on your profile, your account should not use false profile information to impersonate others. We allow compliant Parody, Commentary, and Fan (PCF) accounts on X only if the purpose is to discuss, satirize or share information.
https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/authenticity
How come?
X hit with $140 million EU fine for breaching content rules, TikTok settles https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulat...
- First penalty under landmark EU digital legislation
- TikTok avoids fine with transparency concessions, EU says
- EU's tech chief: X fine proportionate, not about censorship
- US has accused EU of targeting American companies
Politico.eu: EU slaps €120M fine on Elon Musk’s X, straining ties with US https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-slaps-e120m-fine-on-x-str...
Euronews: European Commission hits Elon Musk’s social network X with €120 million fine https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/12/05/european-commi...
CNBC: EU regulators hit Elon Musk’s X with 120 million euro fine for breaching bloc’s social media law https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/05/eu-regulators-hit-elon-musks...