Colors of Growth
Key topics
A novel research paper proposes measuring long-run economic growth by analyzing the use of color in European paintings, sparking a lively debate about the methodology's validity. Commenters raised concerns about the potential impact of factors like lighting, color temperature, and sensor capabilities on the accuracy of painting reproductions, with some arguing that these variations are mitigated when looking at broader trends. Others pointed out that paintings themselves change over time due to aging and restoration, adding another layer of complexity to the analysis. The discussion highlights the creative, if unorthodox, approach to understanding economic history and the importance of considering the nuances of artistic representation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
1s
Peak period
16
0-6h
Avg / period
4.8
Based on 19 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 8, 2025 at 8:13 AM EST
25 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 8, 2025 at 8:13 AM EST
1s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
16 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 11, 2025 at 12:08 PM EST
22 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Whether there's a slight green tint, or a certain blue doesn't pop quite as much, doesn't seem like it would affect the findings.
One might have been altered to reduce the effect of centuries of oil-lamp soot, but it's still true.
Wow!
i mean, it's so natural, no? Yin Yang and stuff, like common sense type of things.
They have ad hoc explanations for the divergences and try to make lemonade out of the lemons by claiming that their index reveals "higher-frequency fluctuations that traditional series smooth over" but I am willing to bet that if they had had to predict the divergences before doing the calculations they wouldn't have been able to.
I think this is probably mostly pareidolia.
The value of the index lies precisely where it converges with broad historical trends and where it diverges, suggesting new information. The observation that the color index frequently changes before GDP is a sign of its validity, not a weakness - e.g. shifting consumer demand/sentiment or supply chain shocks and a leading indicator of GDP
Is the image we see today really what was initially drawn?
E.g. the famous night watch picture, which was larger and brighter.
I would vote to pursue film as the next medium. I would be interested in the predictive potential of your model.
I am not certain this model will teach us a lot but it certainly gets one to think independently which is desperately needed to maintain our humanity.
Thank you for sharing and publishing.