Coinbase CEO Says He 'went Rogue' and Fired Some Employees Who Didn't Adopt AI
Posted5 months agoActive4 months ago
businessinsider.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
AI AdoptionCEO Decision-MakingCorporate Culture
Key topics
AI Adoption
CEO Decision-Making
Corporate Culture
Coinbase CEO fired employees for not adopting AI tools, sparking debate about the role of AI in the workplace and the CEO's leadership style.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
2m
Peak period
11
Day 1
Avg / period
6
Comment distribution12 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 12 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 22, 2025 at 11:36 AM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 22, 2025 at 11:38 AM EDT
2m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
11 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 31, 2025 at 1:32 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 44985883Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 11:23:09 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> [he told] engineers that they didn't have to use the tools on a daily basis yet but "at least onboard by the end of the week."
Would you be fired if you refused to set up a tool (not AI, any tool) that your CEO said you were going to use in the future? And that the company was investing in?
I don't know, but there'd surely be some repercussion.
To use a more unpleasant but realistic scenario, suppose my CEO said "we're moving to use Jira; everyone needs to set up your account by the end of the week. That's how we are going to track work going forward. You don't have to check Jira every day yet, but it's a company wide rollout and you'll be expected to do this soon".
Further, suppose I refused to set up my account because I didn't think it was important to my job or because I didn't want to. (I don't know the motivations of the Coinbase employees, to be clear.)
I think at that point, termination (or at least a warning) would be justified.
If an employee had moral or ethical concerns about using Jira, that's a different situation. But from the article, that doesn't seem to be the case.
Like GP, I read the article too! Different conclusion(s). The CEO wanted a 'good reason'? Control group in this performance experiment. Or, 'fuck off'; how's that? Founder Mode? Cult mode.
edit: Archive link for anyone into it: http://archive.today/LDcBH