Coinbase CEO Revealed He Fired Engineers Who Didn't Use AI Tools
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
finalroundai.comTechstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
AI AdoptionCoinbaseTech Management
Key topics
AI Adoption
Coinbase
Tech Management
Coinbase CEO fired engineers for not using AI tools, sparking criticism and concerns about the company's management and security.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
43m
Peak period
11
0-6h
Avg / period
5
Comment distribution25 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 25 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 3, 2025 at 10:37 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 3, 2025 at 11:20 PM EDT
43m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
11 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 7, 2025 at 12:24 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45122880Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 3:32:02 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
You got AI on my crypto!
The worst Reece's Peanut Butter Cup ripoff.
(Sorry, wrong commercial.)
I've never understood the anger about systemd. Is it over-engineered? Probably. Have I ever had to worry about it not working? No.
A lot of programmers (even young ones) are really set in their ways so I'm going to disagree with that. However there are ways to encourage people to try new things without ultimatums.
Ok, I strongly advise you don't leave any crypto at Coinbase, it's a matter of weeks before they get p0wned.
By using this method you can achieve 100% of code "written by AI", although they won't see an increase in productivity.
If the people at the top think like that your coins aren't safe even without AI.
Garden variety narcissist and boundary bouncing. Some of those engineers might be upset. They shouldn't; good riddance to that environment.
Ultimately this is a hiring problem though. They should have tested more thoroughly for prompt obedience.