Chatgpt Image Snares Suspect in Deadly Pacific Palisades Fire
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
bbc.comTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
AILaw EnforcementCrime Investigation
Key topics
AI
Law Enforcement
Crime Investigation
ChatGPT was used to identify a suspect in a deadly Pacific Palisades fire by analyzing an image, sparking discussions on the role of AI in law enforcement and its potential implications.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3m
Peak period
5
0-2h
Avg / period
2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 8, 2025 at 1:17 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 8, 2025 at 1:19 PM EDT
3m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 9, 2025 at 11:20 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45518414Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 3:29:00 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> Mr Rinderknecht also asked ChatGPT: "Are you at fault if a fire is lift [sic] because of your cigarettes?" Investigators said the suspect wanted to "preserve evidence of himself trying to assist in the suppression of the fire". "He wanted to create evidence regarding a more innocent explanation for the cause of the fire," the indictment said.
> A month before allegedly setting the fire, Mr Rinderknecht allegedly inputted a prompt to ChatGPT that included the text: "I literally burnt the Bible that I had. It felt amazing. I felt so liberated."
Prosecutor: Did the defendant do it?
ChatGPT: Yes! -fire emoji-
Defense attorney: I don't think the defendant did it, he said he was elsewhere.
ChatGPT: You're right! The defendant is innocent!
Here it is (PDF): https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26183108/usa-v-rinder...
The origin fire was extinguished seven days previously but allegedly continued underground. Their assessment that there was one fire that resurged vs two separate fires reads circumstantial rather than proven.
Running with the official explanation, can dormant fires like this be detected via underground temperature anomalies? If high winds are expected, the fire department could then be preemptively assigned to known risk locations.
The broader picture here does look very incriminating (via law enforcement sharing from telcos, Google, OpenAI, and Meta) towards the individual. But it also demonstrates that there was a weeklong opportunity for preventing it from becoming the disaster that it did.
Covert world-saver if true.