Chatgpt, Draw a Picture of a Parrot in Ascii Art

Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago

doener

22 points

15 comments

chatgpt.comTechstory

skepticalmixed

Debate

60/100

Artificial IntelligenceChatgptAscii Art

Key topics

Artificial Intelligence

Chatgpt

Ascii Art

The post shares a ChatGPT-generated ASCII art of a parrot, sparking discussion on the AI model's capabilities and limitations in creative tasks.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

13s

Peak period

4-6h

Avg / period

1.5

Comment distribution15 data points

Loading chart...

Based on 15 loaded comments

Key moments

01Story posted
Sep 18, 2025 at 4:27 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Sep 18, 2025 at 4:27 PM EDT
13s after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
4 comments in 4-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Sep 19, 2025 at 4:49 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (15 comments)

Showing 15 comments

throw310822

4 months ago

1 reply

Nice. It looks like it's not really focusing much on the task and just drawing something by heart; then when asked for the third time it finally produces a much simpler and smaller design that actually resembles some kind of bird. As if this was the actual real effort.

ziml77

4 months ago

2 replies

You say that like it has an understanding. If I could have forked the conversation after it gave a unicorn I would have, but I was able to start my own and ask for ASCII art of a parrot. On the first try it gave me a sitting penguin (probably Tux art from the training data)

When I then asked it if the image was really a parrot it told me that it was "more of a generic 'ASCII bird' (often used as a generic owl/parrot placeholder), not a true parrot."

A sitting penguin is certainly not a generic bird.

firesteelrain

4 months ago

1 reply

   __
  (o)>
  //\
  V_/_

ziml77

4 months ago

1 reply

That's what you might expect a generic sitting penguin to look like, but this is what it actually gave me

      .---.
     /     \
     \.@-@./
     /`\_/`\
    //  _  \\
   | \     )|_
  /`\_`>  <_/ \
  \__/'---'\__/

firesteelrain

4 months ago

Definitely a Linux Tux penguin

throw310822

4 months ago

Yes. Well, it doesn't really "see" the ascii art it's producing because it's blind and it's just reading and writing it as if it were text- so the task is much more complex than it seems to us. I do notice a difference between the first attempt (and your sitting penguin) and the small art at the end. If you've used gpt5, it's possible that it decided to engage its full capacity only at that point, and that the previous answers were less thought through.

But yes I do believe these things understand. There is no other way for them to do what they're doing.

tills13

4 months ago

2 replies

One of the most frustrating parts about "AI" in its current form is that you can challenge it on anything and it play dumb, being like " oops I'm sowwy I was wrong, you're right"

I wish it would either: grow a spine and double down (in the cases that it's right or partially right) or simply admit when something is beyond its capability instead of guessing or this like low-percentage Markov chain continuation.

doenerAuthor

4 months ago

1 reply

https://openai.com/de-DE/index/why-language-models-hallucina...

tl;dr: The models are optimized against a test that evaluates incorrect answers just as well as no answer at all. Therefore, they guess when in doubt.

tills13

4 months ago

I really don't mind guessing but the model should be encouraged to say when it's guessing.

braebo

4 months ago

I was once in an argument with Claude over a bug we were trying to identify in my code, and it refused to concede my argument for almost 20 minutes. It turned out to be correct, and boy was I glad it didn’t capitulate (as it often does). I came up with a prompt that actually reproduces this behavior more reliably than any other I’ve tried:

”When presented with questions or choices, treat them as genuine requests for analysis. Always evaluate trade-offs on their merits, never try to guess what answer the user wants.

Focus on: What does the evidence suggest? What are the trade-offs? What is truly optimal in this context given the user's ultimate goals?

Avoid: Pattern matching question phrasing to assumed preferences, reflexive agreement, reflexive disagreement, or hedging that avoids taking a position when one is warranted by the evidence.”

doenerAuthor

4 months ago

Via https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/115227159913970737

pulvinar

4 months ago

Ask ChatGPT to explain what it's drawing as it adds parts. It's usually more successful. Or at least entertaining. Reminds me of how a young child draws.

CTOSian

4 months ago

google gemini not better LMAO https://g.co/gemini/share/64e01b99c217

homeonthemtn

4 months ago

The emojis are painful.

ravila4

4 months ago

It looks to me like it’s regurgitating training data. The biggest success I ever had with drawing ascii art was with the GPT 4.1 model a while back.

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45294594Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:50:34 PM

Want the full context?