Calvinball Makes the Supreme Court [pdf]
Posted5 months agoActive5 months ago
supremecourt.govNewsstory
informativeneutral
Debate
80/100
LawPoliticsCalvinball
Key topics
Law
Politics
Calvinball
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
11h
Peak period
1
10-12h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 26, 2025 at 12:23 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 26, 2025 at 11:08 PM EDT
11h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 10-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 27, 2025 at 3:25 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45028706Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 11:38:14 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
From page 17 of Justice Jackson's dissenting opinion (page 32 of the pdf) (footnotes omitted):
> In a broader sense, however, today’s ruling is of a piece with this Court’s recent tendencies. “[R]ight when the Judiciary should be hunkering down to do all it can to preserve the law’s constraints,” the Court opts instead to make vindicating the rule of law and preventing manifestly injurious Government action as difficult as possible. Id., at ___ (JACKSON, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 21). This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.
Apparently he's a pretty good guy. Which is why I didn't steal any of his yard signs, despite desperately wanting to.