Cadmium Zinc Telluride: the Wonder Material Powering a Medical 'revolution'
Key topics
The discussion kicks off with a tangent on the meaning of "factoid," sparked by a commenter's casual remark, with some insisting it refers to an incorrect fact, while others argue it can also mean a trivial or unverified fact. As the debate unfolds, commenters dig into the nuances of language, citing dictionary definitions and original sources, like Norman Mailer's usage. Meanwhile, a few participants steer the conversation back on track, connecting the term to the article's topic, Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), and its properties, such as its direct band gap, which makes it suitable for photon-emitting or detecting devices. The lively exchange showcases the complexity of language and the fascinating detours that can arise from a simple word.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
2h
Peak period
6
4-6h
Avg / period
2.8
Based on 25 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 11, 2025 at 8:41 PM EST
22 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 11, 2025 at 11:04 PM EST
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 4-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 12, 2025 at 5:35 PM EST
21 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
In a broader sense, I am always entertained at how Americans will literally change dictionaries before admitting they used a word incorrectly. Sometimes it is tedious, but sometimes when they do it to scientific jargon, it risks muddying the waters of discourse about scientific phenomena with that from "pop science" definition. Psychology in particular is prone to this, with "learned helplessness" and "trauma bonding" being two phrases used incorrectly probably 9 out of 10 times I see them, to the extent that the fake meanings (which are always just the most literal interpretation of the phrase) are incorrectly being treated with the scientific basis of the originals despite having no real clinical evidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_and_indirect_band_gaps
In semiconductors with indirect band gap, when electron-hole pairs combine they usually just heat the material, instead of emitting light, which is why silicon, for instance, is not suitable for making LEDs.
Also, you might actually want to introduce a lattice constant mismatch because the strained lattice has useful properties.
Cadmium zinc telluride is a II-VI semiconductor, not a III-V semiconductor, because Cd & Zn belong to the 2nd group, while Te belongs to the 6th group.
Both the III-V & the II-VI semiconductors, and also the few existing I-VII and the few IV-IV semiconductors (e.g. silicon carbide) semiconductors, are compounds of chemical elements whose number of external electrons averages to 4, i.e. the same as in diamond, silicon or germanium, so they can form crystal structures of the same kind.
While a little strain can be beneficial in some cases, the large strain caused by the mismatches in crystal lattice cell size between various semiconductor layers that must be deposited one over the other in order to make some semiconductor device can cause great problems during manufacturing, by generating various defects that may make the process yield unacceptable.
Because of this, when researching new semiconductor materials a lot of effort is dedicated for finding compositions that can have matched lattice cell sizes.
Here's some spectra with 3% FWHM @ 662 keV:
https://maximus.energy/index.php/2020/05/01/gamma-spectrosco...
Narrower FWHM means you will miss fewer energy peaks from isotopes.
Ahh
I understand the unnamed alternative is the scintillation-type detector, where high-energy photons induce fluorescence, emitting secondary photons of lower energy. Detecting the lower-energy photons (converting to electrons) is a second step.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scintillation_counter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_laser