Ben and Jerry's Co-Founder Quits, Accusing Unilever of Silencing Social Mission
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
theguardian.comOtherstory
skepticalmixed
Debate
60/100
Corporate Social ResponsibilityBrand IdentityAcquisition
Key topics
Corporate Social Responsibility
Brand Identity
Acquisition
Ben and Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield quits, accusing Unilever of silencing the brand's social mission, sparking debate about the tension between corporate ownership and social activism.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
24m
Peak period
2
1-2h
Avg / period
1.4
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 17, 2025 at 7:43 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 17, 2025 at 8:07 AM EDT
24m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 17, 2025 at 1:24 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45274587Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:54:29 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
25 years later, jerry thinks the company has lost its independence? the independence was lost before the ink dried on the sales agreement. unilever never cared about their social mission, period. they've been "dealing" with it since the acquisition.
why not take the sale proceeds and pursue other social missions? btw, phish food is my favorite flavor! <3
I'm not against selling out, but feigned surprise seems a bit out of place.
I would love to see the legal catfight as a new brand called GFBJ (Genocide-Free Ben and Jerry's) opens for sale across a series of supermarkets coinciding with a boycott of Unilever products.
One can dream.
There is a social mission, and then there is outright political bias. Having a social mission could be climate change, responsible sourcing, charity, etc. But the headline image is a Ben & Jerry's tub with a picture of a political candidate on it.
> Greenfield’s resignation is the latest development in a bitter dispute since Unilever backtracked on an agreement allowing Ben & Jerry’s to not sell ice-cream in occupied Palestinian territories, which had been heavily criticised in Israel.
> Last year, Ben & Jerry’s launched a legal action against Unilever, accusing it of threatening to dismantle the board and sue directors over their public statements in support of Palestinians in Gaza.
At some point you have to ask what ice cream has got to do with Israel and Gaza, no matter where you stand on the issue.
Given the political winds, I think Unilever are acting to protect the brand and their investment, and the co-founders become somewhat increasingly more political.