Australia Once the Gold Standard for Gun Safety: Experts Say It's Losing Control
Key topics
Australia's reputation as a gold standard for gun safety is being called into question, with some experts warning that the country is losing control. Commenters are weighing in, with some agreeing that the situation is dire, citing recent violent incidents, while others argue that Australia's strict gun control measures in the 90s were an overreaction that spawned a black market. A lively debate is unfolding around the effectiveness of current legislation, with some claiming that recent changes have made little difference, and others pointing to the nuances between "gun safety" and "gun control" – terms that are not always used interchangeably. The discussion is highlighting the complexity of the issue and the varying perspectives on what constitutes effective gun regulation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
2
3-4h
Avg / period
1.2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 25, 2025 at 10:14 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 26, 2025 at 12:26 AM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 3-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 26, 2025 at 7:21 AM EDT
5 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Only just today two policemen were killed, and a third injured in the rural Victorian high country.
There's been a huge spike in cookers/sovereign citizens using violence through firearms.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-26/victoria-police-incid...
This happened in Wieambilla Queensland in 2022. This story made international news. The policemen and women were executed. Similar story, police perform a welfare check, are shot on sight.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wieambilla_shootings
The assumed suspects from todays shooting are well known to the local community, for all the wrong reasons. Notorious 'sovereign citizens'. More information in the Reddit post below.
https://www.reddit.com/r/melbourne/comments/1n09tef/victoria...
However it all depends on how situations are handled. Sending unsuspecting police to do a welfare check - for instance when another state's police had already sensitised / inflamed someone who wanted to be left alone ... nutters need to be handled with care and / or special tactics used to subdue.
Australia's over the top knee jerk action in the 90s is not a gold standard for gun control.
Almost immediately a black market in gun trade started up via importation (or worse theft) - thus since modern hand guns were not very common amongst the criminal elements up my was (North Qld - Australia) - they soon were - also since not a great proportion of the population sought to get a gun licence, there was a shift to where the criminal element though having an illegal gun (pistol) would give them an upper hand - this IMO soon changed though after a few years, since having such when they were finally busted by the police was probably going to be jumped on harder than any other petty crime they might have endeavoured in.
What mattered most was giving the police the power to remove guns from and prosecute repeat mishandling tools. Scarring the wannabe crime lord / drug king / big time tough guy for what happened in the courts to the few unfortunate examples who mishandled a gun in public. Locking up any loose guns (this is somewhat painful if one needs quick access to a gun but ... it means to stop angry drunks and malignant narcissists having a temper tantrum doing something impulsive.) Controlling the sale of ammunition so that the criminal element has difficulty using any guns they do happen to have.
I miss the weekend gun culture that used to exist in my locale - but it's a different world now - short on common sense.
However such articles and general media reporting in Australia that use the term gun safety - we'd generally take to mean they are talking about gun control including the wider ramifications of laws regarding weapons that are either restricted or prohibited.
The term safety has IMO gained popular usage most likely due to the fact that many people in cities where much of Australia's population resides (where reasons like self defence is viewed as not a genuine reason for a gun licence) - thus they don't (no longer) have guns, there exists a strong view where less guns is seen as safer in the way that if there were 95% less cars in a city there would be less car accidents and thus better car safety.
In cities or large towns there's limited reasons to justify a gun licence with exceptions such as if they belong to a sporting gun club or a recreational shooter visiting rural hunting areas occasionally on their time off.
Australian gun legislation already has every protection you would expect built in. As soon as a Violence Restraining Order is in place, guns are immediately removed. Your guns need to be stored in a locked safe where the safe is bolted to the ground. Background checks on every license application. You really couldn't name a practical improvement to gun safety.
However the "something must be done" approach is applied, which wastes time targeting clearly responsible gun owners.
The trend of firearms per capita and firearm related deaths per capita is relatively stable, although it might have increased from about 8% of USA's figures to 9% of USA's figures, although I haven't established whether the apparent trend is statistically significant (since gun related deaths are a small sample size so the numbers jump around per year).