Astrophysics Source Code Library
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
ascl.netResearchstory
supportivepositive
Debate
40/100
AstrophysicsOpen-SourceScientific Computing
Key topics
Astrophysics
Open-Source
Scientific Computing
The Astrophysics Source Code Library is a valuable resource for the astrophysics community, providing access to a wide range of open-source codes, and sparking discussion about the community's openness and coding practices.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
3
3-4h
Avg / period
1.9
Comment distribution13 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 13 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 12, 2025 at 6:59 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 12, 2025 at 8:17 AM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 3-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 12, 2025 at 5:56 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45220843Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 3:22:58 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
"Code" and "data" are mass nouns, and have been for decades. You don't say "pass the salts", and you shouldn't say "the codes are" or "the data are" either.
</rant>
That said, I love how open the astronomy community is with their code and data. I wish other fields would follow their lead, but given the incentive structure, they probably won't.
If no one had ever seen more than a dozen grains of sand, it would makes sense to count them and say things like "Sue just showed me her awesome gem collection; she has a diamond, two rubies, and three sands!" But when you are ordering sand by the truck load, that starts sounding really stupid, and you need to shift to measuring it ("sixteen tons of sand") and not counting it ("four million trillion sands").
Mass nouns are measured by giving a quantifier and a unit (three bytes, 64 kilobytes) and do not partake of the singular/plural distinction, which only applies to count nouns.
The British / American distinction is actually easier to explain by saying that they don't partake in the "unitary collective" shorthand; the British parliament are a (countable) collection of politicians, while the US Congress is an undifferentiated mass of...something. The Jury is (are) still out which of these best captures the semantic situation, whereas with code and data we are well past the point where talking about an individual code or datum sounds about like talking about a water or an air.
Also I fully agree with the "codes" rant.
Source: working professionally in the field for 4 years.
CERN also provide a lot of open physics data from various experiments and is keep adding large amount each year [1]. Of course this still a needle in the haystack but still more than any individual researcher can ever process.
[1] https://opendata.cern.ch/