An Unusual Way to End Up with a Whole Lot of Gold
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
theatlantic.comResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
20/100
Nuclear FusionAlchemyGold Production
Key topics
Nuclear Fusion
Alchemy
Gold Production
The article discusses an unusual method of producing gold through nuclear fusion, sparking interest and some skepticism among commenters about the feasibility and implications of this process.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
17m
Peak period
3
0-1h
Avg / period
3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 24, 2025 at 1:45 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 24, 2025 at 2:02 AM EDT
17m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 24, 2025 at 2:27 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45356726Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 1:11:06 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Look at what happened to Spain and Portugal when they were uniquely able to flood Europe with gold and silver. It didn't make them masters of the known world, it certainly helped extend bourbon lands but ultimately their economies weren't magically lifted to the stratosphere.
Look at the emergence of bimetallism as a politico-economic movement. Why did people think silver mattered?
Beyond gold rush, look at the economic benefits to Australia and Alaska and Canada and California and South Africa of gold. Is it truly about "the value of the gold" or is it really the value of civil construction and mining and capital investment?
Are we fundamentally short of gold? Is there some Erlich/Simon bet risk here?
I think not. This gold from fusion exercise either revalues gold as meaninglessly cheap and uses for industry continue, or proves uneconomic and pointless. It won't be 1000 years of money flowing like rivers of gold, unless they constrain supply to match real demand for gold as a value object.
Diamonds are the same. Massively propped up value proposition divorced from supply and industry. Argyle pink diamonds personify everything wrong with the diamond business.
I suspect they're shilling for JV investors to fund fusion in 50 years.
So I don't knock anyone individually doing gold as an investment strategy any more than anything else. And it's a lot better than some other things. Wine, whisky, very risky.
But they'd be shitting their pants at the risk of fusion sourced gold happening.