An Eyecare Foundation Model for Clinical Assistance
Original: An eyecare foundation model for clinical assistance
Key topics
A new eyecare foundation model is making waves for its potential to revolutionize clinical assistance, sparking a lively discussion around its implications and the complexities of eye health. One commenter, Daub, shared a personal anecdote about losing an eye due to a workshop accident, highlighting the sometimes-rapid progression from injury to enucleation, which left others questioning the role of antibiotics in preventing such outcomes. The conversation took a practical turn when another user asked about the model's availability, to which the author, jameslk, responded by sharing the training and fine-tuning code on GitHub. As the discussion unfolded, it became clear that this technology is not only intriguing but also timely, given the ongoing quest for more effective clinical assistance tools.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
9h
Peak period
3
30-36h
Avg / period
1.6
Based on 11 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 28, 2025 at 5:57 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 29, 2025 at 2:55 AM EDT
9h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 30-36h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 1, 2025 at 1:16 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I went to the optician a few weeks ago in order to get a new pair of glasses who performed the usual tests. She knew full well that I have only one eye, but when testing my functioning eye she handed me the eye occluder to place over my non-functioning eye. I asked her why she was doing this as it served no function but she clearly did not understand the question. It took nearly a full minute for me to explain to her how pointless using this occluder was. It was rewarding to see the veils of habit lift when she finally grokked my point.
As for the article... it seems like a valid application of technology. Relevant to my anecdote, some doctors/diagnosticians/scientists/scholars are too entrenched in habits... they only see what they expect to see. The accident that led to my loss of vision was impossible to miss, but its seriousness was initially overlooked by at least two professionals.
My first mistake was in seeing a optometrists rather than ophthalmologists. However, all of them failed to recognize my case as one where I needed to be referred. To an optometrist, even a broken leg would be treated with eye drops.
The other thing that went wrong is that the surgeons I saw were nervous about proceeding with enucleation even when my condition became very advanced. I think that this nervousness came from the fact that I could still see out of that eye, and as a matter of insurance they wanted me to be blind before they would operate. But by then the infection might have spread to outside my eyeball.
Following surgery was a bit of a trip. For a few days I hallucinated in my missing eye... strange worm-like things, very Giger. Even now, in response to sudden movement or loud noises, I 'see' bright lights in that eye.
Maybe I'm missing part of the story, but going from infection to enucleation seems crazy. But I have no idea what's involved.
The upside is that i get to choose the color of one of my eyes. Also I rock a cool eye patch.
There’s a sample of the data here: https://zenodo.org/records/15546254
Looks like the weights are not available though. Several have asked in the GitHub issues it seems