Americans' Love of Billiards Paved the Way for Synthetic Plastics
Key topics
The development of celluloid, an early synthetic plastic, was driven by the demand for billiard balls, and its invention had both positive and problematic consequences. The discussion highlights the complex history and impact of plastics.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
7d
Peak period
25
156-168h
Avg / period
11.3
Based on 34 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 8, 2025 at 7:25 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 15, 2025 at 12:03 PM EDT
7d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
25 comments in 156-168h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 16, 2025 at 11:20 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Depicted in the brilliant "Connections" series by James Burke [1].
Scrub to 29:12 [1] https://archive.org/details/james-burke-connections_s01e09
I'm also not clear that this somehow "paved the way" for synthetic plastics. Was an early mover precisely because it was a luxury activity. But I don't think anyone thinks they would have not been invented had it not been for the sport?
Everything we know could have been invented by someone else earlier if they had tried (many things depend on earlier inventions and so earlier is often only a few years). Most of them would be invented by someone else a few years latter as well. However we remember the person who invented it (and often the person who made it successful) and not the others who didn't.
Daniel Spill, who worked with Parkes directly in England, founded several companies with Parkes selling Celluloid in England.
Spill and Hyatt spent the better part of a decade in court against each other over who invented it first and who has the right to the patents. The judge ultimately ruled that both of them can continue their businesses, and that Parkes invented it first.
I mean, I'm not sure that it's _complaining_, as such. All in all, it's probably preferable that billiard balls are made of plastic and not ivory, even if they were initially mildly explosive.
It is when we willingly took hegemony of the world economy for the last 80 years, and we at least pretend like this is representative of the interests of americans.
The fact that we clearly haven't been able to implement at least common-sense regulation of use of plastics in consumer industries is a pretty clear indication we are to blame, IMO. We haven't even been able to make it less shitty of a consumer experience, let alone pretend to care about health.
I think you're imposing these value judgments yourself. The article isn't framing the innovation of synthetic plastic balls as a bad thing. If anything it's celebrating America's contribution to material science, which isn't unexpected from the Smithsonian.
"Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
are you taking it personally?
Huh. There's a mention in a Discworld book of an exploding billiard ball, and until just now I hadn't realised that it was a _real thing_.
(Seems to by no relation to the Hyatt who invented the annoying hotel chain, incidentally.)
https://www.lspace.org/books/apf/men-at-arms.html
-- Harold Hill
I like the promotional quote at the end. It ties in petroleum too. Again, our dependence on petroleum is coming back to haunt us, but at the time, it averted extinction for whales. Mass adoption of technologies always comes with tradeoffs.
then again, it didn't stop us from glomming onto GPTs after seeing what we did with socials.
Just saving elephants from extinction alone is probably worth an enormous amount.
I usually phrase similar in context of energy usage and how any improvement we can make in our personal lives (renewables, EV>ICE, efficient appliances, etc) is basically dwarfed by crypto and now AI. Seems we will continue inventing & promoting rather unnecessary technology that do exactly the opposite of what We, as a species, need to do from an energy use perspective
Cellophane/rayon/viscose is kind of a borderline case. The content of the finished polymer article is 100% natural cellulose, without even so much as a nitrate or acetate group affixed. But the process of dissolving that cellulose from plant matter so that you can form it into sheets or spin it into microfibers involves chemicals that are so nasty that nowadays they are used almost only for this purpose.
In my childhood (the 01990s, not the 01890s) ping-pong balls were still made of explosive celluloid. My father, who attended a mining college, demonstrated by dropping one onto an electric stove burner, not hot enough to glow visibly. It disappeared in a puff of flame. I was disappointed to discover recently that this is no longer the case for the ping-pong balls I found.
Modern-day cables are armoured with polyethylene (which resists seawater rot far better than simple rubber), mylar, steel cables, aluminium, polycarbonate, and petroleum jelly.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutta-percha>
(James Burke's Connections, mentioned elsewhere in this thread, also describes this use and significance of gutta-percha.)
I suspect you are referring to a different use of rosin and beeswax, but the mixture was used for centuries for sealing - which is for information security. It was mixed with either arsenic-based or copper-based minerals to both color it, and protect it from slow fungal attack, so seals (after about a century of colorful failures) were always red or green.
A slightly different proportion was used as "code" (no relation to cyphers), a shoemaker's waterproofing glue for seams. AFAIK no coloring was added.
Are there any "natural" plastics ?
1 more comments available on Hacker News