America Needs Tough Grading
Key topics
The article 'America Needs Tough Grading' argues that the US education system has become too lenient, leading to grade inflation and a lack of preparedness among students, sparking a heated discussion among commenters about the role of grading and parental involvement.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
18
0-12h
Avg / period
5.2
Based on 26 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 2, 2025 at 10:19 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 2, 2025 at 12:10 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
18 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:29 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
What is the goal of "tough grading" when they, and a majority of the population, actively despise any kind of expertise?
Grade inflation and an environment that is unwilling to challenge our children can be a problem even if bad things are going on elsewhere. One could argue that a system that encourages kids to work hard, face challenges, and value deep thought might make the population more resilient against anti-intellectualism.
You don't think so, but kids aren't stupid and see what's going on.
Also, this isn't 500 BCE; we live in 2025. Humanity no longer needs to learn the basics of common decency, morality, and legality through the mythical threat of a being(s) in the sky helping or hurting an eternal life that simply does not exist after death.
Try to keep up with reality. It is on display right now, and there is reason to think the Supreme Court will allow it.
https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2025/09/02/ten-commandments-...
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/07/the-ten-commandments-retu...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/aug/...
We may disagree on carbon credits, but we nobody disagrees on having clean water, sustainable sources of energy, regulations on sanitation, waste, and pollution; affordable education; term limits and abolishing lobbyists. The list goes on.
Mellow out and focus on the substance without letting your TDS flare up.
They are actively working to destroy as much environmental regulation as they can and further the interests of fossil fuel corporations.
Citation needed.
Where would we get as a society, indeed.
> It’s no coincidence that as grades have gone up, civic friendship between people with different views and backgrounds has gone down, both on campuses and in the nation at large. Students are so confident in their beliefs that they verbally assault professors and guest lecturers and physically assault classmates and janitorial staff. A dose of humility is needed, and it can start in the classroom.
I'm not convinced that grade inflation is causing verbal and physical assaults.
Views, I don't know. Backgrounds I'd attribute to the cost of college significantly outrunning inflation.
Too frequently, what people (and clearly the author of this piece) mean when they say "tougher grading" is just a return to forcible bell-curve application and faculty who take out their personal insecurities and annoyance over being required to teach classes on their students. That's not making academics more challenging, it's just torturing statistics and arbitrarily modifying the race-course in order to satisfy other agendas. If you have a good teacher and a good course and more than half the class does well, you should consider making the next iteration more challenging, but you should not feel obliged to fail 10% of them because "there's always a bell-curve", nor should you be using grading as a means to "humble" your students.
I emphasized the word "consider" up there because not every course needs to be a slog up Everest, either — an "intro to X" course might well be a class in which many people do well. Some percentage of them will be people looking to make that their major, so they'll already know enough to be ahead of the curve in an "intro" course. Others will be bright people who learn well and adapt to the material. As someone who teaches classes regularly at the college/grad-school level, I try to make the content interesting and challenging, but if most of my students turn in work that exceeds standards and are coming out with a good understanding of the content, I feel like I've accomplished my goals — academia is supposed to be about learning after all, and they're displaying that they've correctly learned the content I wanted to communicate to them. I do spend time trying to re-work the course regularly (something I'm forced to do much more since the explosion of sites like Chegg...), but past a certain point if something is clearly working, why am I obliged to break it?
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/america-needs-tough-grading-educ...
--
I attended Undergrad from 1997 to 2001 and I distinctly remember the first paper I received from a new Associate Professor in my major (History) that was a C-. I argued that it would have been an A-level grade in any other professor's class; this new professor told me, in no uncertain terms, that it was most definitely a C- grade and I needed to do better. I did and it made me a better researcher and eventually writer.
I finished that course with a hard-earned B+ and I felt better about myself and my abilities thereafter. As a D1 athlete, I had clear goals and expectations set for me by those who I was against and whom came before me. This was the first time in my academic career where I felt I had received a challenge and clear guidelines on how to improve; something I felt helped me achieve better outcomes.
Education is not intended to be a breeze; it's intended to be a challenge to help you stretch and grow. Just because you and/or your family is spending tens of thousands a semester does not give anyone the right to skate by with the bare minimum effort applied.
I have high expectations for my children academically. My undergrad and graduate degrees were paid for by others (athletics and my employer) alongside of my own work in both. I want my children to grow up and be successful and they will not be if I smooth the road for them in unfair ways. I explain that, in life, they will face uncertain and likely unfair challenges from external forces and they need to not only stretch and grow in their knowledgebase to challenge these forces, but they should also learn to navigate them with grace--an academic exercise in and of itself.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2...
Here's a whole book about the issue, published in 2003: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b97309
And here's one from 1991: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.5.1.159
Folks, this is an annual grouching point among folks who care about or work in academia. Nothing to see here.
-- Edited to add that I am a community college English professor. Most people pass my class because the college has set the final drop date one month before the end of the semester, so students have plenty of time to avoid a bad final grade.
Like others report uni profs made me better. Wherever my English prof is at ... thanks a ton! Leadership, caring, and know how. You were marvelous.