Airpods Pro 3
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
apple.comTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
20/100
Airpods Pro 3AppleWearable Technology
Key topics
Airpods Pro 3
Apple
Wearable Technology
The announcement of AirPods Pro 3 has sparked discussion on HN, with users expressing interest in its new features, such as in-ear heart rate monitoring, and questioning their accuracy.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
17m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 9, 2025 at 1:18 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 9, 2025 at 1:35 PM EDT
17m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 10, 2025 at 4:16 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45185181Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 7:50:26 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> Look, I’m not gonna waste your time – this thing is dumpster-fire inaccurate level in almost every realm of heart rate accuracy except for indoor cycling.
[0]: https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2024/05/sennheiser-momentum-temp...
If it wasn't yet up to par it would make it just give "warnings" instead of numbers (like the apnea and blood pressure measurements).
The researchers had 24 healthy participants wear an Apple Watch Series 6—which is outfitted with the same blood oxygen reader as the newer Apple Watches—on their left wrist while placing the medical-grade reader on their left middle finger. The participants wore breathers that slightly reduced the oxygen they took in over a few different phases, and the researchers recorded the blood oxygen levels recorded by each device at 30-second intervals. The Apple Watch is very close to achieving accuracy levels of a pulse oximeter. The blood oxygen level (which is called SpO2 in the study) bias across all data points was 0 percent. Here’s the rest: “The bias for SpO2 less than 90% was 1.2%. The differences in individual measurements between the smartwatch and oximeter within 6% SpO2 can be expected for SpO2 readings 90%-100% and up to 8% for SpO2 readings less than 90%.”
"AirPods Pro 3 introduce a custom photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor that shines invisible infrared light pulsed at 256 times per second to measure light absorption in blood flow. Combined with sensor fusion from the AirPods Pro accelerometers, gyroscope, GPS, and a new on-device AI model on iPhone ..."
This same hardware, or its next iteration, will probably allow for silent speech recognition with a software update. This will be a total game-changer in terms of human-computer interactions.
Sadly, it'll be up to Apple to make this a reality since they don't expose the raw sensor data.