AI Code Is Creating More Ops Incidents – Who Should Own Fixing Them?

Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago

royvijay

3 points

2 comments

Techstory

calmneutral

Debate

20/100

AIDevopsSre

Key topics

Devops

Sre

Discussion about the ownership of fixing incidents caused by AI-generated code.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

34s

Peak period

0-1h

Avg / period

Key moments

01Story posted
Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Sep 10, 2025 at 2:09 PM EDT
34s after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Sep 10, 2025 at 2:18 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (2 comments)

Showing 2 comments

royvijayAuthor

4 months ago

We’ve been noticing something interesting as AI copilots become common in software teams: they generate a lot of production code, but when incidents happen, Ops teams still have to manually investigate. From our conversations with SREs, ~80% of incidents are still being dug through by humans, even though many originate from AI-generated modules that devs don’t fully understand themselves.

We wrote up a short post on why this gap exists and what might be next. Curious if others here are seeing the same?

https://medium.com/@vijayroy786/why-ops-teams-cant-keep-up-w...

gnabgib

4 months ago

Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45201531

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45201551Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:11:48 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

View on HN