After Elon Musk Launched the 'cancel Netflix' Campaign, Netflix Shares Down 2.2%
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
forbes.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
Elon MuskNetflixCancel Culture
Key topics
Elon Musk
Netflix
Cancel Culture
Elon Musk's 'Cancel Netflix' campaign sparks controversy over Netflix's content, causing a 2.2% drop in shares, with HN commenters debating the implications of Musk's actions and Netflix's content choices.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
1h
Peak period
6
0-3h
Avg / period
2
Comment distribution16 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 16 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 2, 2025 at 5:03 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 2, 2025 at 6:06 AM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 3, 2025 at 3:42 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45447601Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:00:08 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Wow. Replace "transgender" with "homosexual" and you get the homophobia of the late 20th Century. Are some people really so afraid of their kids learning that some people are happy being transgender?
(Interestingly, early noughties transphobia had a fairly different character; the “think of the children” aspect is fairly new.)
This kind of moral panic around kids is new (though, as I mentioned, it very much echoes the homophobic movement a few decades ago), as is the bathrooms thing.
I’m convinced that its emergence at least in this part of the world was almost entirely due to the British right needing a new wedge issue after Brexit; you see it being suddenly pushed very hard out of nowhere there post-2016, and especially post-2021. From Britain, it leaked out, with European transphobia having a strong British flavour.
As to the sudden shift in the UK, Cameron and May's Conservative governments planned to introduce self-ID (and Cameron was very noisy about the UK's high rating on LGBT rights - of course it has since slid quite a bit in those rankings...), Boris was kinda transphobic but not particularly loud about it, but then by 2022 you see Penny Mordaunt basically facing a sort of transphobia purity test in her leadership campaign (https://news.sky.com/story/penny-mordaunt-dismisses-claims-a...). It was a really rapid about-face.
In fact, the recent UK Supreme Court case which resulted in a ruling that references to "sex", "woman" and "man" in the Equality Act refer to biological sex (as in, a person's sex observed at birth), was brought by a small group of women who met on FWR.
More generally, I think much of the reason that the UK has been so successful in resisting and reversing policy that prioritises self-declared gender identity over sex is that we have a strong tradition of women's advocacy for single-sex provisions, that has been pursued regardless of other political affiliations.
> Current policy debates regarding transgender people’s access to restrooms and other gendered facilities are predicated on narratives about protecting the safety and privacy of women’s spaces. These narratives lack evidence showing any negative impacts on safety and privacy in women’s restrooms or other facilities when transgender people can use restrooms according to their gender identity. However, transgender people consistently report having negative experiences in restrooms perpetrated by others, including denial of access, verbal harassment, and physical assault. Evidence suggests that transgender people are put at added risk if required by law to use restrooms in accordance with their sex assigned at birth.
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/safety-i...
Like for example, women in prison won't have any problem if they don't look stereotypically feminine. But they certainly are under significant threat if male prisoners are locked up with them.
Elon disowned his trans daughter Vivian, so yes. It doesn't matter to him that she is happy, what matters is that this isn't what he wanted, and now he's lashing out at the world for letting this injustice happen to him.
Vivian alleges that Elon uses sex-selective IVF with a preference for boys, implying those control freak tendencies go back to before she was even born. He didn't just want a son, he demanded one, and then that child turning the tables on him broke his brain.
5 more comments available on Hacker News