Accuracy of Apple Watch Vo2 Max Measurements: a Validation Study
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
10/100
Apple WatchVo2 MaxFitness TrackingValidation Study
Key topics
Apple Watch
Vo2 Max
Fitness Tracking
Validation Study
A study validates the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements, sparking interest in the discussion around fitness tracking technology; however, the low number of comments suggests a muted response.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 24, 2025 at 12:42 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 24, 2025 at 2:14 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 24, 2025 at 2:14 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45696375Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 9:13:53 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
However, in my experience it is very inaccurate. When I first got my Apple Watch, I went on a run with it to see if it offered anything that my Garmin didn't. After this run, the Apple Watch estimated a VO2 max roughly the same as my Garmin, which I've had for years.
I didn't use the Apple Watch for running ever again, only for things like walking to the store. It then estimated a VO2 max that was over 10 points lower than the estimate from the running activity.
The Apple Watch seems to have a traditional way to estimate VO2 max, which seems roughly comparable with competitors and a treadmill test; and a separate bad way estimated from non-exertional activities.