A Review of Nuclear War: a Scenario by Annie Jacobsen
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
militaryrealism.blogResearchstory
calmmixed
Debate
25/100
Nuclear WarSurvivalLong-Term Effects
Key topics
Nuclear War
Survival
Long-Term Effects
A review of 'Nuclear War: A Scenario' by Annie Jacobsen sparks discussion on the consequences of nuclear war.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 12, 2025 at 9:14 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 12, 2025 at 10:39 PM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 12, 2025 at 10:39 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45228469Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 2:01:52 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
As a child like many others of the boomer cohort, I lived the belief "protect and survive" was futile. I am no longer sure that's healthy, any more than risking the outcome is.
I've been led to believe the North and South hemisphere weather systems are more coupled than people used to think and so assumptions transport of dust and radionuclides would predominantly lie in the north are probably wrong. Also, given Pine Gap in Australia, and the likelihood of SSN being in southern oceans, some level of strike in the south is inevitable.
What's often missed is that the big megatonnage weapons were passed over for smaller delivery systems in MIRV. Not that no high yield weapons exist, but many many more tuned yield weapons exist, as well as neutron dense weapons which would do less direct damage and just leave a lot of dead people around. Not a pretty world, but 200 years later..
The smoke blanket assumed entire forests went up. Self sustaining megafires. Lofted dust would reduce surface temperature significantly and food production would drop off. But, and forgive me if this is naieve, would persisting radionuclide levels in the ocean actually kill all marine life? Would transport of dust into the soil as we've seen in Pripyat not mean we had a more complex tainted surface? One with toxic mushrooms but also with quite high sustained wildlife levels, in some chaotic adjustment.
Also, EMP effects are confusing. Valves survive. As do magnets. Find enough old cars and you'd get magneto and batteries to do cooking and run spark gap radio in Morse until you find a golden ears stash of pentodes, and discrete parts in an old radioshack hut. It's not like we didn't make relay logic work when we had to, so losing vlsi doesn't mean we're back at vellum and gall ink, until all the ballpoint pens dry up.