$5 Whale Listening Hydrophone Making Workshop
Posted27 days agoActive21 days ago
exclav.esstory
informativepositive
Underwater AcousticsDiy ElectronicsWildlife Monitoring
Key topics
Underwater Acoustics
Diy Electronics
Wildlife Monitoring
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
32
96-108h
Avg / period
8
Comment distribution40 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 40 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 11, 2025 at 3:42 AM EST
27 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 11, 2025 at 5:59 AM EST
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
32 comments in 96-108h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 16, 2025 at 5:03 PM EST
21 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 46229030Type: storyLast synced: 12/15/2025, 7:00:36 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://github.com/Vivek-Tate/IDS-Detection-and-Exploiting-V...
I worked on DAS acoustic monitoring for subsea power cables (to monitor cable health!), turns out they are basically a submarine detection system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS
For interest:
* it's one reason we know so much about ocean tempretures and tangentially have great data on climate change being real, and
* they had some cool R&D vessels:
~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RP_FLIPA supplier played whale song they recorded from cables, and said they repackage and sell the same product to defense contractors.
Supposedly new submarines are so quiet that they can't be detected anyway. I'm sure there's a large element of exaggerating abilities here, but there's definitely an element of truth: in 2009, two submarines carrying nuclear weapons (not just nuclear powered) collided, presumably because they couldn't detect each other. If a nuclear submarine cannot detect another nuclear submarine right next to it then it's unlikely your $5 hydrophone will detect one at a distance.
Of course, none of this means that the military will be rational enough not to be annoyed with you.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Vanguard_and_Le_Triomphant...
Information here from a superb podcast
Here [1] is a page at Klover, and here [2] is one at Shure. Not sure if there's a formal specification for this, or if it's just something that manufacturers started doing.
[1]: https://www.kloverproducts.com/blog/what-is-plugin-power
[2]: https://service.shure.com/s/article/difference-between-bias-...
Can we now have lot of audio records with a documentation of whale behavior to train an AI and get a whale-translator at the end?
Most bioacoustics work now is: deploy a recorder, stream terabytes to the cloud, let a model find “whale = 0.93” segments, and then maybe a human listens to 3 curated clips in a slide deck. The goal is classification, not experience. The machines get the hours-long immersion that Roger Payne needed to even notice there was such a thing as a song, and humans get a CSV of detections.
A $5 hydrophone you built yourself flips that stack. You’re not going to run a transformer on it in real time, you’re going to plug it into a laptop or phone and just…listen. Long, boring, context-rich listening, exactly the thing the original discovery came from and that our current tooling optimizes away as “inefficient”.
If this stuff ever scales, I could imagine two very different futures: one is “citizen-science sensor network feeding central ML pipelines”, the other is “cheap instruments that make it normal to treat soundscapes as part of your lived environment”. The first is useful for papers. The second actually changes what people think the ocean is.
The $5 is important because it makes the second option plausible. You don’t form a relationship with a black-box $2,000 research hydrophone you’re scared to break. You do with something you built, dunked in a koi pond, and used to hear “fish kisses”. That’s the kind of interface that quietly rewires people’s intuitions about non-human worlds in a way no spectrogram ever will.
Why not? You can run BirdNET's model live in your browser[0]. Listen live and let the machine do the hard work of finding interesting bits[1] for later.
[0] https://birdnet-team.github.io/real-time-pwa/about/
[1] Including bits that you may have missed, obvs.
But yeah, totally been doing projects like this for a long time lol not sure why OP implies you wouldn't do that. First thing I thought was "Oh man I want to put it in the lake near me and see if I can't get it detecting fish or something!"
Same. Although my first effort with my hydrophone (in my parents pond) was stymied because they live on a main road and all I picked up was car vibrations.
Maybe that's your solution - get a fish tank/pond and hydrophone!
RTL-SDR is another area where this there is so much to see 'hidden' in electromagnetic radio frequency space.
Recording full-fidelity whale or dolphin sounds (amongst others) requires using a higher sample rate than is available in most consumer-grade equipment. There's a lot more information down there!
For example:
12 MHz (i.e. 12 000 kHz) sample rate per channel, 4 channels, 16 bit ADC:
https://www.akm.com/eu/en/products/mfp-lbp/ak8471vn/
single digit dollar unit prices:
https://octopart.com/search?q=AK8471VN¤cy=USD&specs=0
Where could I learn more about requirements for this as a I love building tools like this.