Why Many Asian Megacities Are Miserable Places
Key topics
The misery of many Asian megacities is sparking a lively debate, with commenters weighing in on the factors that make cities like Shanghai and Tokyo exceptions to the rule. While some point to the unique governance structures of these cities - Shanghai as a province-level municipality and Tokyo's Metropolitan Government handling key public services - others note that Shanghai's administration is still controlled by party members, not elected officials. The discussion highlights the complexities of urban governance, with some citing the lack of coordination between governing bodies and the impact of systems like Japan's Jūminhyō and China's Hukou on non-residents. As one commenter quipped, "all happy cities are alike, each unhappy city is unhappy in its own way," reflecting the diverse challenges facing these megacities.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
27s
Peak period
22
0-6h
Avg / period
7.5
Based on 30 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 16, 2025 at 10:03 PM EST
24 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 16, 2025 at 10:03 PM EST
27s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
22 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 20, 2025 at 2:36 PM EST
20 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> The Tokyo Metropolitan Government (tmg) is responsible for big-ticket public services such as water, sewage and public hospitals. Beneath it sit 23 wards and a host of peripheral cities and towns. Each municipality has its own elected mayor and assembly, responsible for services such as schools, waste management and community planning. The tmg co-ordinates between them. It is a sensible split that clearly delineates authority while also making sure that decision-making is joined up.
The vague description "run by the central government as a province rather than a city" is uninformative.
Southern Chinese cities are better run than Northern Chinese cities. Not just Shanghai, but Hangzhou, Suzhou, Nanjing, Wenzhou...heck, even Kunming has better drivers and traffic than you'll see in Beijing.
But, conversely, a poor farmer in Yunnan was less likely to choose to become a migrant worker in Kunming instead of a Tier 1 metro.
IMO, Beijing's craziness can be attributed to the fact that it is the economic center for much of Northern China - and a number of migrants from large neighboring laggard states like Hebei, Shanxi, Henan, and others ended up gravitating to Beijing.
> Shanghai usually gets the CPC members running it who will lead the country in the future
Not anymore.
The problem in Beijing that everyone on the road was an official or related to an official, so the police couldn't do traffic stops without risking their careers. That has changed a bit, and they invested heavily in the Black Audi police (CPC police who are allowed to police official and their families) to counterbalance the chaos that everyone being connected caused.
> Xi's tenure in Shanghai was transitory (less than a year from what I remember) and imo was due to his previous role in Zhejiang.
Not that we have much to go on since Xi is president for life now, but I bet the next leader of China does their time in Shanghai like the previous ones.
> Those are all closely connected with Shanghai economically speaking, and all part of Zhejiang or Jiangsu.
Wenzhou is more a Fujian extension, Zhejiang and Jiangsu are China's richests provinces, and I think Hangzhou has left Shanghai's shadow by now.
We can also throw in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, but in general even the poorer southern cities (Kunming, Guiyang, I kind of want to say even Changsha and definitely Wuhan/Chongqing) are and have been well organized.
and yeah. dmk airport is inside bangkok while bkk is in the next province.. why only can color within the lines?
For example, if your hukou is registered to a rural community, you do not have access to the same level of public healthcare that people with Shanghai hukous have.
This system creates weird incentive schemes where rural areas offer 'benefits' to city folk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAoJYJR8o3g
Beijing had a similar problem as well, but because it was surrounded by Hebei and Tianjin (a fellow 直辖市) it made coordination easier.
Hanoi has the exact same problem as Delhi for the exact same reasons as well.
South Asia is another new invention.
No one goes around saying "I'm a South Asian."
As for terminology, especially when it comes to geography and geopolitics, it depends on who's using the term and what their agenda of the day is.
Gulf of Mexico comes to mind.
Comparing India and Indonesia to China and Japan is like comparing Mexico and Brazil to Canada the US.
Just because they’re in the same continent doesn’t mean they’re comparable.
The name is always a giveaway of their agenda.
Today, for similar reasons, cities are chicken coops where the inmates are not much different from the human batteries in The Matrix; they live to work, generally without realising it, for masters who are no longer in the city. Technologically, they are failed places, because they cannot evolve without being rebuilt from scratch, and they cannot be rebuilt on such a scale, both due to the impact of the work and the quantity of raw materials required.
Most people never weigh the real cost of a modern city; they are so accustomed to owning nothing that they think what is there is natural, ignoring what they don't see, whether underground (like the cathedral with mega-pumping stations to mitigate flooding beneath Tokyo) or in the surrounding areas to bring water and food, because we all eat, but in the city no one produces.
The cities of the coming century are ghettos, polluted and devastated, where misery is concentrated like a compound, while wealth leaves the compound to reclaim life in nature.