The Power of Proximity to Coworkers [pdf]
Posted26 days agoActive25 days ago
pallais.scholars.harvard.eduResearchstory
informativeneutral
Debate
20/100
PsychologyConversion_rate_optimizationBehavioral Science
Key topics
Psychology
Conversion_rate_optimization
Behavioral Science
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
2m
Peak period
7
0-2h
Avg / period
2.2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 8, 2025 at 9:00 PM EST
26 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 8, 2025 at 9:02 PM EST
2m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 9, 2025 at 4:33 PM EST
25 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 46200420Type: storyLast synced: 12/9/2025, 3:25:13 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Interesting questions raised by this, for myself at least,
* how do hybrid schemes work out: some home, some office, less commute overall?
A HN submission yesterday on Australian studies showed remote work being mostly loved in AU, having little productivity impact either way for many, having significant benefits for for people with spectrum / social issues.
* has any tried junior coder meetups with experienced coders "out of office"?
Co working at one home or another, at public libraries, etc.
There's certinly people I know that live several hundred km away from a capital city, work remote, and come in for two or three days to catch up with everbody once a fortnight, once a month, etc.
It helps to have a wider PoV perhaps.
2) FIFO is rarely 2 days in office 3 at home, it's 2 weeks on site and 1 week off -- or similar. Many day stretches. "once a month, etc." is far more common.
3) FIFO to major cities like Perth is more workable simply because the airport and infrastructure are there. It's a shorter flight to somewhere like Carnarvon, West Australia, but they literally don't have the aiport size or housing capacity.
I think it depends on the type of work. I work as a support engineer for business stakeholders. Business stakeholders don't work in "Sprints", and always want to get anything ASAP. In that sense, if I want to maximize my value to the company, in-office is the best.
But frankly, I don't like that, so working remote is the best for me, IN THAT PERSPECTIVE. However, I do love the snacks in office, and I want to keep my job, so hybrid works the best for me. The stakeholders get to bug me from time to time in 3 days per week, and I book as many meetings as I can in those 3 days, and bring a non-fiction just to breath a little better.
I just wish Toronto has cheaper housing though, so I can live closer to the office.
Using KLOC as a KPI falls into the trap Goodhart's law and of PHB mentality.
The problem here is that most companies and workers lack the IT skills to operate as a virtual company or a learning organisation, so onboarding is complicated and gaining experience is difficult. Skilled workers are frustrated by the inefficiency of less competent colleagues and the organisation itself, while all the friction points are highly visible rather than hidden within in-person collaboration.
This can't be studied without comparing virtual companies/learning organisations to companies from the time of Taylor/Weber/Fayol.