The Senior Population Is Booming. Caregiving Is Struggling to Keep Up
Key topics
Regulars are buzzing about the looming caregiving crisis as the senior population explodes, with many predicting a perfect storm of labor shortages and unsustainable costs. Commenters riff on potential solutions, from incentivizing family caregiving to leveraging technology to support elder care. Some point out that the issue is not just about numbers, but also about the emotional toll on caregivers and the need for better support systems. As the demographic shift accelerates, the conversation highlights the urgent need for innovative and compassionate approaches to caring for the aging population.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
46m
Peak period
15
2-4h
Avg / period
9
Based on 27 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 21, 2025 at 4:05 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 21, 2025 at 4:51 PM EST
46m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
15 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 22, 2025 at 8:54 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
These included homes for clients who were non-ambulatory, clients who had profound health issues and one home for dd-so. Besides living and healthcare expenses, the agencies had regulatory overhead imposed by 3 different governing agencies.
Even with all of this, the clients had lives with daily offsite activities, jobs, public events, theme parks, etc.
The per-client budgets of these group homes were tiny compared to nursing homes. They were funded by client SS disability payments, supplemented by some modest public funding.
These homes where founded and administered by boards made up of the client's families. Importantly, they were non-profit; they lacked the massive overhead that comes with shareholder obligations and executive salaries+perks.
They've been providing superior care for over 4 decades. After I left, they began to experience a persistent risk of funding cuts. These were driven by a major hospital chain executive who became governor and then state senator.
There's some schadenfreude seeing the boomers complain about getting the enshittification treatment they themselves got rich off.
A shareholder relationship is parasitical and exploitive by it's nature, as defined by Dodge Brothers v. Ford.
Making pension funds feed on that relationship - that is whatever that is. I couldn't call it a necessary evil because it's by design.
The same line boomers enjoyed riding on while their property and other investments went up massively without any effort on their part, at the expense of subsequent generations.
Now, they're getting a taste of their own medicine as someone else (private equity in this case) wants to ride the line going up and even just robbing subsequent generations isn't enough to pay for it.
Realistically the only way to stabilize the price of caregiving is to automate the hell out of it, like Japan is trying to do. It's a rather dystopian thought that the only way senior care won't bankrupt us is if we have robots do it all, but what can you do.
Labor, who pays a sizeable chunk of their income on rent... and rent, well is rent. Rent is only expensive when demand outstrips supply, and demand keeps being artificially constrained by existing property owners (of which boomers are a large chunk) not willing to take a hit on their property value. Seems like a self-inflicted problem.
1. And other goods mass manufactured.
~ https://iview.abc.net.au/show/old-people-s-home-for-4-year-o...
There's a lot I can say about older populations and their abilities despite being old, right now I'm have to step out for the day for several hours, possibly more, so I'll just leave this one approach above that's been tried and works well.
Also, the elder population aren't homogenous by any means, there are a good number that can assist others with meals, gardens, etc.
I always thought this would be a market Japan would dominate with their aging population and early development in robotics, but I don't think I'm seeing that.
This is the crux of it. The government should also subsidize and directly administer more senior care, especially given the economic drag from having family members step into these roles
[1] https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~jesusfv/Slides_London.pdf
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-polit...
22 more comments available on Hacker News