The Return of the Tribe – Vancouvered Weblog
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
marc.cnOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Socioeconomic TrendsWealth InequalityLifestyle Changes
Key topics
Socioeconomic Trends
Wealth Inequality
Lifestyle Changes
The article 'The Return of the Tribe' sparks discussion on the potential societal shifts in response to wealth inequality and the behaviors of the rich, with commenters offering diverse perspectives on the issue.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
43m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 13, 2025 at 10:43 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM EST
43m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 13, 2025 at 1:02 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45916234Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:03:52 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Many who can afford it will move into giant private citadel communities created by the ultra-rich. Think Vegas but focused on not sinning.
This is largely a false narrative that doesn’t hold up to real-world cases.
1. The wealthy already use many techniques to disguise “income”, such as receiving shares and taking out loans on the valuation of those shares to pay for living expenses. There are ways to close those loopholes tightly, the problem is that some politicians also use those same loopholes, so why would they cut off their own noses? And most politicians are funded by the wealthy, so why would they bite the hand that feeds them? This means that increased taxation of the wealthy is a political cock-blocking, not any sort of structural difficulty.
2. If said wealth is from a business, especially any kind of non-virtual one where there is a physical presence (factory, etc.), they are most definitely NOT mobile. It costs massive amounts of money to just move a business down the street - usually 3-12× annual earnings, and that is keeping the same workforce and with exceptionally low-cost short-distance moving - and you’re worrying about them leaving the entire jurisdiction?? Offshoring alone took 75 years to achieve, so most “wealth flight” isn’t going to happen within a single quarter-century.
3. There are much better ways to combat wealth accumulation, such as taxing the profit margins of businesses themselves. This forces business owners to increase “costs” such as employee wages and infrastructure/equipment investment, and reducing dividends and other forms of for-the-wealthy disbursements. Taxation can also happen to the company based on aggregate executive compensation regardless of whom it goes to, cutting off specific loopholes in favour of a wider, more difficult to evade net that is completely independent of individual incomes.
The options for effective redistribution of wealth away from those who have done nothing to earn it, and bringing it back to the working class who are the entire source of said wealth, exist and can be implemented. We just need the political will and stomach to actually put them into practice.