Why Unions Are Becoming a Problem for Self-Driving Cars
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
axios.comTechstory
skepticalmixed
Debate
60/100
Self-Driving CarsLabor UnionsAutomation
Key topics
Self-Driving Cars
Labor Unions
Automation
The article discusses how labor unions are potentially hindering the adoption of self-driving cars, with commenters debating the validity of the article's claims and the impact of automation on unionized workforces.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
25m
Peak period
7
0-3h
Avg / period
3.5
Comment distribution14 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 14 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 9, 2025 at 11:34 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 9, 2025 at 11:59 AM EST
25m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 11, 2025 at 12:09 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45866773Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:20:52 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
They certainly succeed at protecting their industries when they can’t be replaced, but there really isn’t a remedy for an employer who is willing to not have a workforce.
As to what you are required to support...
No he didn't. He said the unions are obsolete, not the trades.
Then, once the job's done, you want that person off your payroll and out of your life. You don't care too much about the cost of labor, you just need it done right the first time. I can imagine a craft union being suitable for providing access to that kind of labor.
But driving cars and trucks around... yeah, no, that's a robot's job, sorry.
Also, without blacksmiths, where am I going to take my plate shield armor? I need it for ren faire.
Have a look on videos from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh or other part of south east Asia, where people are working in environment which can easily injure them or kill them. That's how European factories were looking like before unions have become to be a thing. Unions are direct consequence of greed of 19th century capitalists who refused to invest even bare minimum into safety and pay their workers properly while not working them to death.
This is the March of Dimes syndrome. Unions had noble goals at first, which they've fully accomplished (things like occupational safety rules are now the law for all employees, union or non-union), so they no longer have any useful purpose and their continued existence is now a net negative.
Like collective bargaining power for higher wages and benefits is net negative? I don't think so.
Then, when the ILWU strikes, they get to hold the entire economy for ransom and extract concessions for a job that all of America would benefit from automating.
How is that not a net negative?
The negative aspects of unions in America are by legislative design, too. Laws have been passed to make unions work more poorly for workers and increase their unpopularity.
You don't really need to engage with the process and its statistically proven to hurt fewer people.