Physicists Take the Imaginary Numbers Out of Quantum Mechanics
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
quantamagazine.orgResearchstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
60/100
Quantum MechanicsMathematicsPhysics
Key topics
Quantum Mechanics
Mathematics
Physics
Physicists claim to have removed imaginary numbers from quantum mechanics, but HN commenters are skeptical about the achievement and its implications, questioning the significance and usefulness of this development.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
34m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 7, 2025 at 11:25 AM EST
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 7, 2025 at 11:59 AM EST
34m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 7, 2025 at 3:25 PM EST
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45848054Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:46:44 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Also, it's well-known that calling imaginary numbers "imaginary" was sophomoric humor from early mathematicians - they're just as 'real' as the real numbers, not some mathematical invention or fantasy. It’d be nice if we could change the name, but that water has done flowed.
As a lay person, I don't see too much of a problem with having "i" included in equations just because it's an invented maths concept. It certainly has very real applications with phases in electronics.
What a breakthrough!
----
Related:
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9984/3/1/9
"our knowledge of quantities is necessarily accompanied by uncertainty. Consequently, physics requires a calculus of number pairs and not only scalars for quantity alone. Basic symmetries of shuffling and sequencing dictate that pairs obey ordinary component-wise addition, but they can have three different multiplication rules. We call those rules A, B and C. “A” shows that pairs behave as complex numbers, which is why quantum theory is complex."
https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0909
"the complex nature of the quantum formalism can be derived directly from the assumption that a pair of real numbers is associated with each sequence of measurement outcomes, with the probability of this sequence being a real-valued function of this number pair. By making use of elementary symmetry conditions, and without assuming that these real number pairs have any other algebraic structure, we show that these pairs must be manipulated according to the rules of complex arithmetic"