Meta Is Earning a Fortune on a Deluge of Fraudulent Ads

Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago

StayTrue

59 points

9 comments

reuters.comOtherstory

heatednegative

Debate

80/100

MetaFraudulent AdsSocial Media Regulation

Key topics

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

20m

Peak period

2-4h

Avg / period

1.3

Key moments

01Story posted
Nov 6, 2025 at 8:11 AM EST
2 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Nov 6, 2025 at 8:31 AM EST
20m after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
3 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Nov 7, 2025 at 3:59 PM EST
2 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (9 comments)

Showing 9 comments

robhlt

2 months ago

2 replies

There's a lot more to this investigation than the headline suggests. Reuters has internal documents that show Meta is more concerned with losing ad revenue than combating scams and concluded that regulatory fines would likely be less than their revenue from scams.

mdhb

2 months ago

“A May 2025 presentation by its safety staff estimated that the company’s platforms were involved in a third of all successful scams in the U.S.“

cornonthecobra

2 months ago

that's really the problem. regulatory rules are so impotent violating them is nothing more than an operating expense for large corporations.

We need forfeiture of all revenue earned by violating activities, and C-suite criminal liability. Not that we'd ever get such measures, but it is what it would take, as documented in other countries that have successfully combatted corporate intentional misconduct like this.

mdhb

2 months ago

1 reply

Meta projected 10% of its 2024 revenue would come from ads for scams and banned goods, documents seen by Reuters show. And the social media giant internally estimates that its platforms show users 15 billion scam ads a day. Among its responses to suspected rogue marketers: charging them a premium for ads – and issuing reports on ’Scammiest Scammers.’

dspillett

2 months ago

Call me cynical if you will, but only 10% seems to be a low-ball estimate to me.

gverrilla

2 months ago

meta = organized crime

damnesian

2 months ago

giving Amazon vibes.

Desafinado

2 months ago

Just imagine having to be the face of this company. Imagine telling your own kids this is how you made your fortune.

That's not worth all the money in the world.

hedayet

2 months ago

> "If the company is less certain – but still believes the advertiser is a likely scammer – Meta charges higher ad rates as a penalty, according to the documents"

In other words: More "uncatchable" scammers == higher scam rate == more $$$$ for Meta

I'd assume whoever came up with this scheme was rewarded handsomely by Facebook

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45834840Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:08:48 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Open link View on HN