Universal Child Care Can Harm Children
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
economist.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
Child CareSocial PolicyChild Development
Key topics
Child Care
Social Policy
Child Development
The article argues that universal child care can have negative effects on children, sparking a discussion on the nuances of child care policies and their impact on child development.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
50m
Peak period
5
0-2h
Avg / period
2.2
Comment distribution11 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 11 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 5, 2025 at 10:41 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 5, 2025 at 11:30 PM EST
50m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 6, 2025 at 3:52 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45831128Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 7:54:38 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
One way to see the issue more clearly is by imagining someone is getting subsidized childcare for child 1. Now they’re looking to have another child and also want that child’s childcare to be free or subsidized. Why should other people subsidize thats 2nd child? The person can clearly not afford the 2nd child. Staying with that logic, what then gives that person the right to ask me to subsidize their first child’s childcare in the first place?
If they have already cut expenses like holidays, eating out, not gambling, not buying dumb non-educational toys, etc. then I might be more empathetic, but I am confident that they are spending on those non-essential luxuries.
You might be paying a portion of their childcare, but you are not paying their childcare. One could say the same to parents at a private day care. They are, after all, only paying their portion of the cost of the service, not the cost of the service.
> they want it free or subsidized
How do they get it for free? Again, do you think they aren't paying their taxes?
> The person can clearly not afford the 2nd child.
This does not follow. If the economic reality in which they choose to have a child includes tax-paid childcare, and they can afford a child given that, then they can clearly afford the child.
Even if it is, it is worth noting that it isn’t all sunshine and roses in those countries from a demographic point of view, notwithstanding universal childcare.
For instance, New Zealand is facing an uncertain future due to weak economics, leading New Zealanders seeking prosperity elsewhere: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/09/leaving-new-ze...
which means you now have a ton of very very small children who need care. and in most cases these kids aren't doing much, just kinda laying there. the warehousing more or less happens after that, since it's a lot easier to pack em in.
you end up with 8 to 1 caretakers, and studies have shown that ain't great for the little ones.