What Happened to Ukraine's Missile Defense
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
missilematters.substack.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
UkraineMissile DefenseIsraelWar
Key topics
Ukraine
Missile Defense
Israel
War
The article discusses the decline in Ukraine's ballistic missile defense intercept rates, sparking a discussion on the effectiveness of missile defense systems, with comparisons drawn to Israel's experiences.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
33m
Peak period
7
0-3h
Avg / period
3
Comment distribution12 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 12 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 4, 2025 at 6:13 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 4, 2025 at 6:46 PM EST
33m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 6, 2025 at 9:04 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45816987Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:30:03 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Israel must by now have intercepted more missiles of all kinds then the rest of the world combined, and more ballistic missiles too. They managed to shrug off 4 to 5 rounds of saturation attacks from iran with almost no major hits. Something like a 95% successful intercept rate. That's not even discussing short range Iron Dome interceptions.
I can only guess the difference is more sophisticated missiles, a larger area to defend and fewer resources to do so. I still feel i'm missing something here.
Would you have some numbers on how much was shot down by Israel and how much by allies ? I didn't find anything
https://jinsa.org/jinsa_report/rising-lion-air-defense/
> almost no major hits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Military_Censor
> saturation attacks
They weren’t saturation attacks; in fact many were surprised by their small size compared to preceding True Promises. Unlike Israel, which had to tap out after 12 days, with a face-saving intervention by the US, Iran was in for the long haul.
> Missing something
Israel + US + friends had the highest density air defence network with plenty of interceptors and it wasn’t enough. They had all the time and space to operate without threat and yet by the end Iranian drones were hitting Israel. Given area and supplies and proximity, it’s just hopeless for Ukraine. Also, previously claimed interception rates were exaggerated.
By the end the attacks tailed off, because they simply ran out of launchers and missiles. True their strikes got more successful as they started avoiding central israel, but it was more like a 5% hit rate instead of 1%.
At the end of the day the attacks led to a couple of dozen deaths instead of the predicted 500 to 2000. Irans entire command structure had been battered and they were desperate for an exit, even though it's true that Israel would have been unable to sustain the war for too much longer. In the end israel was able to shrug off everything that Iran could throw at it, at the same time as severely degrading their capabilities. I think a more accurate conclusions is that you need to combine air defence with intelligence and offense in order for it to work.
That 70% figure sounds wrong. I've seen wildly different numbers online. One thing is certain that hundreds of interceptors were fired. I would be surprised if just 2 thaad systems did the lions share of the work. That certainly doesn't match up to the claims of the IDF, and if it was true the Americans wouldn't stop boasting about it.
The report I linked and you obviously didn’t read directly contradicts you: 574 ballistics total with no wave larger than 40.
> because they simply ran out of launchers and missiles
No evidence of the former and the latter is laughable.
> In the end…
… they murdered a bunch people, destroyed a bunch of things and achieved no strategic goal. No follow-through, no follow-up. Luckily, being the Jewel in the Crown, they are largely isolated from the consequences of such aggression and failure.
> 70% figure sounds wrong
Feelings. Wild claims online. Well, it’s quite possible Israel as well the US used even more interceptors than they care to admit. But that doesn’t help your case.
> That certainly doesn't match up to the claims of the IDF, and if it was true the Americans wouldn't stop boasting about it.
You must be new to US-Israel relations.
Ukraine does the same too, obviously, but missile/drone defence is harder than attack, and there’s a numbers disparity in terms of interceptors and being able to place them in the right places.
Iran got just a couple of goes at Israel and didn’t get a similar chance to learn from and adapt to what it learned in the process.
The main thing you missing is scale. Sheer amount of missiles Russia sent over four years is in thousands, in drones in 10’s of thousands.
Very unlikely more than Ukrane alone (unless you count fireworks from Hamas and alike). Iran just didn't launch this many. Besides they are less advanced.
Additionally, Israel has the unwavering support of the world's biggest superpower, while (FOR SOME UNFATHOMABLE REASON) even the Biden administration kept a policy of "give the Ukraine just enough support to survive, but not to win against their mutual enemy".
Now, of course, the US is run by Putin's little toy.