A Durable Coding Agent – with Modal and Restate
Posted2 months ago
restate.devTechstory
calmpositive
Debate
0/100
Serverless ComputingDurable ExecutionAI Agents
Key topics
Serverless Computing
Durable Execution
AI Agents
The article discusses building a durable coding agent using Modal and Restate, highlighting their collaboration for reliable and efficient execution, with the HN community showing interest in the technical details.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
1
Start
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 3, 2025 at 8:55 AM EST
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 3, 2025 at 8:55 AM EST
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Start
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 3, 2025 at 8:55 AM EST
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45798967Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 7:50:13 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The core insight: durability matters more than you'd think for agents. When an agent takes 5-10 minutes on a task, crashes become inevitable. Rate limits hit. Sandboxes timeout. Users interrupt mid-task. Traditional retry logic gets messy fast.
Our approach uses Restate for durable execution (workflows continue from the last completed step) and Modal for ephemeral sandboxes. We get automatic failure recovery, interruptions for new input, great scalability, and scale-to-zero without any custom retry code. The tradeoffs: coupling to Restate's execution model and requiring discipline around deterministic replay.
How are you handling long-running agent workflows to make them run reliably at scale?