Terence Tao Focused on Fundraising After Federal Funding to Ucla Was Suspended

Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago

breve

54 points

17 comments

washingtonpost.comResearchstory

heatednegative

Debate

70/100

Science FundingUniversity AdministrationResearch Impact

Key topics

Science Funding

University Administration

Research Impact

Mathematician Terence Tao faces fundraising challenges after UCLA's federal funding was suspended, sparking discussion about university financial management and research support.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Moderate engagement

First comment

Peak period

4-6h

Avg / period

2.8

Comment distribution17 data points

Loading chart...

Based on 17 loaded comments

Key moments

01Story posted
Oct 31, 2025 at 7:16 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Oct 31, 2025 at 9:46 AM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
6 comments in 4-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Nov 1, 2025 at 3:16 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (17 comments)

Showing 17 comments

andsoitis

2 months ago

2 replies

Why doesn’t UCLA or the University of California system (UCLA is a part), solve this for Tao’s program so that he can focus on the things he is uniquely positioned to do? I suppose it could’ve because he IS the marketing…

qwerpy

2 months ago

2 replies

The headline "Terence Tao focused on fundraising after federal funding to UCLA was suspended" also makes for better marketing than "UCLA diverts tiny part of massive war chest to address temporary funding issue".

Yeul

2 months ago

1 reply

The headline should be that America no longer has free and independent universities and is speed running China.

Larrikin

2 months ago

Maybe the USSR, China still seems to be innovating.

stiglitz

2 months ago

That doesn’t seem like an accurate synopsis of the article at all.

momoschili

2 months ago

These days the thing he is most unique positioned to do is not math, it's getting funding.

parkaboy

2 months ago

3 replies

UCLA has a $10B endowment. I find it bollocks that they and these other academic institutions can't just dip into that for their researchers to (hopefully) ride out the current funding situation at a minimum.

intermerda

2 months ago

2 replies

[flagged]

veggieroll

2 months ago

The vast majority of people talking about how big university endowments are don't care what the rules are on it. It's not that people don't know how endowments work; they just find the rules to be bullshit to justify universities continuing the status quo.

dang

2 months ago

Please don't cross into personal attack.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

dekhn

2 months ago

2 replies

It's not bollocks, the endowments are contributions that have constraints on their spending. They cannot legally redirect much of the endowment towards these researchers in the way you want. Instead, they use the endowment as an investment that produces interest which is spent on operating expenses.

tgma

2 months ago

1 reply

The way you describe it as if a widow is reaching out to interest from a nest egg to get by and I got a little tear.

But since I do know better:

- some of these endowments grow over time to infinity.

- that's tax-free gain/interest and any hedge fund would kill to get that special treatment.

As long as they have such special tax treatment, it is only fair they should stay in line with a framework that taxpayers provide.

dekhn

2 months ago

1 reply

No endowment grows over time to infinity; that's hyperbole (and impossible).

The tax-free status - that's definitely something that could be changed by updating the laws (legislative). That sounds a lot better than the executive division starving UCLA of funds.

tgma

2 months ago

- Infinity is not a number. "To infinity" means grows without bounds (under the current underlying system; now I do agree the system will at some point adjust.)

- Politics operates in reality, not ideals. There would never be such a legislation without a forcing function like this.

eviks

2 months ago

Is this just a general dismissal or so you know the actual number?

> They cannot legally redirect much of the endowment

Since endowments at top universities are huge, they don't need much. So how much before it's "illegal"?

bad_haircut72

2 months ago

Maybe Tao cares about the long term health of the university, is against the policies that are hurting it (and the entire country if USA loses its top position as desirable academic hub) and wants to use his fame for something useful

yurivish

2 months ago

https://archive.is/xd67g

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45770765Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 12:32:34 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Open link View on HN