Deepseek-Ocr:10x Compression and 97% Accuracy Beats Tesseract and Paddleocr
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
deepocr.ccTechstory
supportivepositive
Debate
10/100
OcrDeep LearningTesseract
Key topics
Ocr
Deep Learning
Tesseract
The post compares DeepSeek-OCR with Tesseract and PaddleOCR, claiming superior performance, and receives generally positive reception from the HN community.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 29, 2025 at 5:35 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 29, 2025 at 5:35 AM EDT
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 29, 2025 at 5:37 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion (2 comments)
Showing 2 comments
18272837023
3 months ago
Deepseek OCR is indeed powerful. I believe its greatest contribution lies in offering a revolutionary approach to memory—enabling AI to form stronger associations through visual cues rather than contextual information. As for text extraction, it's merely a necessary means to achieve its core objective, akin to a complimentary side dish.
KaraokeAuthor
3 months ago
This in-depth benchmark compares DeepSeek-OCR (MIT licensed), PaddleOCR, and Tesseract. DeepSeek-OCR achieves 96-97% accuracy on OmniDocBench and uses its unique 10x text compression for millisecond inference on long documents. It is 2-3x faster than Tesseract in production and outperforms PaddleOCR on complex layouts (like tables and formulas), being named the best Deep OCR tool for 2025.
View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45744556Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 8:08:08 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.