U.s. Details Gambling Cases Involving Pro Athletes and Mafia Families
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
nytimes.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
SportsGamblingOrganized Crime
Key topics
Sports
Gambling
Organized Crime
The US has detailed cases involving professional athletes and mafia families in illegal gambling schemes, sparking concerns about the integrity of sports and the impact of sports betting.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
16m
Peak period
23
0-3h
Avg / period
6
Comment distribution54 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 54 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 23, 2025 at 1:37 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 23, 2025 at 1:53 PM EDT
16m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
23 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 25, 2025 at 10:58 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45684548Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:00:08 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Really bad look for the NBA picking up a second major scandal this year, illegal Balmer payments to Kawhi Leonard being the first.
Just stuffing any table with two or more "players/bots" that can see all the cards or share their hands with each other would guarantee enormous payouts on the hundreds of millions at stake in the industry. There are obviously a million more things sites could be doing to take money and there's absolutely no source code control the government does to ensure that the whatever code the regulators look at is running in production and that no other systems are running in parallel, like a bot service that colludes to win.
Now, sports exist to facilitate gambling. Sports are interesting to viewers who have money on the line, and thus the authenticity is irrelevant and actually undermines the sport. Every gambler wants to believe they have an edge and that the outcomes are rigged... in their favor. If the outcomes are determined by the players simply trying their best, then what's the point of gambling?
All these people making predictions like this is some bold leap into the unknown but it's been legal in the UK since the 1960s.
UK regulations are also more coherent, centralised, and strict than the patchwork US model.
The question is whether the US has the gumption and collaborative power to put something similar in place before the damage is done.
I wish this was posted on every comment thread with that reminder.
"The 1877 Louisville Grays scandal was an incident in which members of the Louisville Grays baseball team accepted money to lose games. Four players – Bill Craver, Jim Devlin, George Hall and Al Nichols – were subsequently banned from professional baseball for life."
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1877_Louisville_Grays_scandal
Can anyone take a guess at what this means?
>The card information will be known to the viewers by using RFID (radio-frequency identification) technology for the very first time at the WSOP. Each card has a microchip embedded in it that has no impact on the cards or play, but with a specially-outfitted poker table, can send an encrypted signal to decipher the card’s rank and suit. The WSOP has used this technology during the 2012-13 WSOP Circuit season with success, and it is found throughout European poker events as well.
You know what the sad part is?
They won't.
Wrestling and roller derby would need to give audiences something to bet on before they would switch from football-soccer-basketball-baseball.
A switch away from the popular bet-able sports will never happen in the absence of another set of corrupt bet-able sports.
Later it meant "I like sitting on couch watching guys on TV kick the ball".
Now it means "I am a gambler".
They don't necessarily have or need evidence that Billups was aware of the rigging, just the regular financial crimes of taking payments from the Mafia that will presumably get him to cooperate.
>Mr. Nocella said the technology also included “specially designed contact lenses and sunglasses to read the backs of playing cards, which ensured that the victims would lose big.”
This technology (in a fictionalized eyepatch form) was the setup of the "I also like to live dangerously" joke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkzMA1jrm00
The way I envision it working is a customer wearing the magic glasses says they have superstitious beliefs and they need the convenience store clerk to spread the tickets out so that they can 'see the aura' or w.e. of the tickets so they can pick a winning one.
I'm curious if this is even illegal. I assume that somewhere it would be but I bet that in a lot of places it isn't and if you were subtle about it you could get away with it for years.
Of course this all relies on the idea that the sensor is something that fits in glasses, or can be discretely hidden in a broach or something they wear with the video feed displayed on their glasses.
They're not x-ray glasses and won't help you with scratch cards. Besides, someone working with a store or bribing a cashier would make way more sense than goofy theatrics about auras.
Or, are you talking about 'consequences'?
Oh come on Chauncey Billus didn’t do his betting in Crypto like Dogecoin we just gonna let everybody skate like George Sorry-Ass Santos I guess?
Damn answered my own question.
Wired did a follow up article today in relation to this news: https://www.wired.com/story/how-hacked-card-shufflers-allege...
The video from 2023 explaining it all and demonstrating it is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ20ilE5DtA
11 more comments available on Hacker News