The Price of Mandatory Code Reviews
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
newsletter.manager.devTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
20/100
Code ReviewsSoftware DevelopmentTeam Management
Key topics
Code Reviews
Software Development
Team Management
The article discusses the potential drawbacks of mandatory code reviews in software development, sparking a discussion on their effectiveness and potential alternatives.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
41m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 22, 2025 at 5:20 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 22, 2025 at 6:01 AM EDT
41m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 22, 2025 at 6:27 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45666623Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 9:10:45 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Maybe developers spend more time on reviewing and testing their code when they commit directly to the main branch, then when they know someone else is going to review tge code en perform the merge? How bad is a bug when it is caught the same day?
(I'd rather draw a line with code review being/not being a norm, rather than whether it's mandatory. It can be mandatory and still shit.)
And as you suggest, I would expect that trunk-based development leads to greater care for quality. Add to that code reviews that seem to improve quality even further. I don't see a contradiction here.
Also, what the data suggests is that, for good productivity, it may be more important to have short lead times (from development to production) rather than just "no mandatory code reviews."
If you can expect code review to be done just-in-time, you retain the context, limit the tax of context switching, avoid Zeigarnik effect (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeigarnik_effect), etc. So I guess this may be a sweet spot reconciling two sources.