EU Agrees to Gradually End Russian Gas Imports by January 1, 2028
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
reuters.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
30/100
EU Energy PolicyRussian Gas ImportsEnergy Security
Key topics
EU Energy Policy
Russian Gas Imports
Energy Security
The EU has agreed to phase out Russian gas imports by 2028, a decision that reflects both a strategic move towards energy security and concerns about the feasibility of such a timeline.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
16m
Peak period
5
0-3h
Avg / period
2.7
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 20, 2025 at 7:11 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM EDT
16m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 22, 2025 at 1:36 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45650592Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:40:40 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Remember that Iranian banking assets and aircraft parts have been tied up in embargos for multiple decades. These kinds of things feel like "if I was king for a day..." solvable, but the awful reality of modern life means respect for contract matters, at least between most economies. There's a newer trend to act like the agreement has no force, because no force can be brought if you decide to tear it up. But that ignores the economic forces which come back into the room when you try to re-negotiate on favourable terms next time round.
re-negotiate here, in the widest sense: Europe will be importing gas an oil products for a long time, worldwide. The nature of a supply contract and the capital investment in pipes, engines to process supply, pumping and distribution is a capital outlay which expects decades of recovery time on fee. If the Nordstream pipes don't get used, some bank is carrying debt. If future pipes need to be built, some bank expects to see a return on investment.
I think 2028 is achievable. I wish they'd moved faster on this, and put some systems resilience into place back when the signals were clear. Obviously it's not like nothing has been happening the last 2 years, I just don't think it's been happening fast enough.
I'm probably blinding myself to the cases where Europe walks off things before a contractual deadline and so Europe incurs the consequences. I tend to think thats what this 2028 thing IS: avoidance of the commercial risk side.
International contract law is soft law [1]. None of it permanently binds states, much less against belligerents.
Europe's pussyfooting around matters of security is precisely what has left it vulnerable to exploitation by the Russian military and American and Chinese economies. If, in the future, Moscow stops being a pest, negotiations can include those past penalty clauses. If Moscow does not, the discussion is moot. (Similar outdated legalism plagues the EU moving at a snail's pace on seizing Russian assets as war reparations.)
In the meantime, the status quo is America, China, Russia, India, Turkey, Israel and the Gulf States are acting the way great and emerging powers do in a multi-polar world: embrace sovereignty. (When Argentina is barred from the international markets, Europe can revisit contractual purism. In the meantime, indulging delusions of an enduring American unipolar rules-based international order is a unilateral cession of power and wealth.)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_law
Quite dehumanizing, isn't it?
Hungary https://apnews.com/article/hungary-oil-danube-refinery-fire-...
Romania https://ukranews.com/en/amp/news/1112511-explosion-at-lukoil...
What would you call 9/11 then?