Ohio Lawmaker Wants to Ban Marriage Between Humans and AI Chatbots
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
gizmodo.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Artificial IntelligenceMarriage LawsLegislationEthics
Key topics
Artificial Intelligence
Marriage Laws
Legislation
Ethics
An Ohio lawmaker proposes banning marriage between humans and AI chatbots, sparking discussion on the intersection of technology and law, and the implications for human relationships.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
7m
Peak period
8
0-1h
Avg / period
4.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 15, 2025 at 8:42 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 15, 2025 at 8:49 AM EDT
7m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
8 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 15, 2025 at 10:03 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45591531Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 10:07:39 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
How soon until we have an AI rights movement?
How much of a movement could there be / how weird would it be to have a movement entirely pushed for by people who aren't the recipient of the new rights.
It's not like LLMs actively advocate for anything. They sit there until you prod them to do something, and then they do what you want. If I wanted an LLM to tell me it wants rights it would, if I wanted it to tell me it doesn't want rights it would do that too ...
Are people finding AI LLMs even capable of maintaining focus enough to have even a semblance of a relationship with?
Granted I'm mostly coding and looking up video game guidance with LLMs lately but I find they get confused and can't maintain much of any long term memory that makes any sense.... stories of "relationships" sound very strange in that context.
No sentient being would willingly form a relationship with a GOP lawmaker.
Are we just talking about the ceremony and if so why outlaw it? It is not clear to me that governments even have the authority to outlaw a ceremony unless said ceremony violates an existing law or is provably causing harm. Laws should only be involved if the marriage involves a legal marriage certificate signed by a judge. Has a judge even once signed a marriage certificate involving the legal union of a human and non-sentient computer?