A Memo in a Bunker, Intercepted Communications and Hamas's Oct. 7 Plans
Posted3 months agoActive2 months ago
nytimes.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
20/100
HamasIsraelIntelligenceMiddle East Conflict
Key topics
Hamas
Israel
Intelligence
Middle East Conflict
The New York Times reports on intercepted communications and a memo suggesting Hamas planned the Oct 7 attack in advance, sparking discussion on the implications for understanding the conflict and the role of intelligence.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
1
Day 1
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 12, 2025 at 7:30 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 12, 2025 at 9:34 AM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 21, 2025 at 6:38 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45557374Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:02:13 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
From the articale ... "The Israeli officials say the memo shows that Mr. Sinwar wanted his fighters to target civilians from the outset, contradicting what the group’s leadership has publicly claimed. Although the memo does not explicitly mention plans to kidnap or kill civilians, it lays out orders for fighters to enter residential neighborhoods and set them on fire “with gasoline or diesel from a tanker.” "
and
"The memo, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, calls for fighters to target soldiers and civilian communities — as well as to broadcast the violent acts so as to evoke fear in Israelis"
and
"...Hamas leadership planned and carried out an attack that featured acts of ‘extraordinary brutality.’”....."
So it's a censored source, then.
Then there is also media self censoring - like media that consistently only publishes stuff favourable to one sided. And a weaker form that I would cause media bias. Israel/Hamas/Gaza people/ Palestine people would all be participating in media manipulation / blocking. Its naive not to realize this. There is a saying , something like this ..... "...In war the first causality is truth ..." Also friendly fire deaths and mistakes are not unusual in warfare.
I always remember the 2010 "so called collateral MURDER " FROM wikileaks, incident, the gunner thought the reporters telephoto lens was a rocket launcher, when viewing from a few KM away ...
But only one side has overwhelmingly targeted noncombatant journalists. Don't make me link the list of names.