Research Shows There Are No Easy Fixes to Political Hatred
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
phys.orgResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
10/100
Political PsychologySocial Science ResearchConflict Resolution
Key topics
Political Psychology
Social Science Research
Conflict Resolution
Research suggests that addressing political hatred is complex and multifaceted, with no straightforward solutions, a finding that prompts reflection on the challenges of mitigating political polarization.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
17m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 7, 2025 at 2:07 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 7, 2025 at 2:24 PM EDT
17m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 7, 2025 at 3:09 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45506592Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 11:08:37 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
They assume the underlying political system is inherently good (when the voting and legislative procedures demonstrably maximize polarization and exclude third parties) and more seriously, that both parties are good and animus felt by the public is just misalignment that can be easily corrected.
The ignore the fact of party apparatus being a giant amplification machine to promote the views of those who control the parties - a small subset of the members or even the elected legislators - via the media, and to thereby activate the larger body of party supporters. And they ignore the polarization-maximizing behavior of party leaders, who profit by maximizing disagreement. Finally, they ignore that these are not simply systemic problems. There are individual politicians who knowingly and cynically lie and and openly seek to inflict harm upon their opponents, and numerous supporters who want to be political actors who knowingly repeat those lies, marketing them to both he ignorant and the cynical.
It would be absurd to write a paper asking 'why don't human rights advocates and human rights violators get along?', yet we have this ongoing stream of papers about polarization that treat political party affiliation as a fundamentally meaningless abstraction, never engaging with the question of why adversarial partisans develop a dislike of each other in the first place.
https://www.amazon.com/Rights-Talk-Impoverishment-Political-...
I can tell you if we have involuntary degrowth and a population collapse [1] the next social organization will have a bill of responsibilities and not a bill of rights.
[1] there are four hundred horsemen of this apocalypse, if you want to focus on resource depletion, pollution and conflict be my guess, but the fact that people in the core are giving up on wanting to reproduce is deeply problematic