Starbucks: Location Closures and Elimination of Roles
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
about.starbucks.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
StarbucksStore ClosuresUnionizationCorporate Restructuring
Key topics
Starbucks
Store Closures
Unionization
Corporate Restructuring
Starbucks announced the closure of underperforming locations and elimination of around 900 non-retail corporate jobs, sparking discussion about the company's priorities and treatment of employees.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
1m
Peak period
54
0-2h
Avg / period
9.6
Comment distribution115 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 115 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 25, 2025 at 1:02 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 25, 2025 at 1:03 PM EDT
1m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
54 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 26, 2025 at 9:23 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45375516Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:51:32 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Wonder how many of these are being closed because they've unionized?
None of the people who had done the original push to unionize were still around. They had been students, graduated, and moved on. Eventually the staff got frustrated enough with their own union rules that they successfully voted to un-unionize and the store improved a fair bit. Bizarre situation.
“Having a supervisor around” isn’t necessarily a requirement from the union.
Edit: If I'm remembering right, the thing that finally sealed the deal for them was that Starbucks corporate was offering better benefits to the entire company than the union (which was made up of like 10 people) had negotiated for themselves.
This was union-busting by Starbucks. The union was more than happy to accept the better benefits, but Starbucks corporate refused to negotiate with them to update their contract. Starbucks was acting in bad faith to undermine the union the workers had organized for themselves.
https://sbworkersunited.org/map/
But, strangely, it was only considered a tripping hazard at stores that had unionization efforts afoot...
What are the non-retail partners?
I've only been to the Reserve location in Midtown Manhattan once and it was very different experience than your run-of-the-mill location. Specifically, I had a drink replaced without asking because the barista said it had "died" while I was in the (nice, clean, great smelling) restroom. Overall, it was just a nice, pleasant experience and I definitely would have frequented that location if I was working in that area regularly. I wonder if this shop was a union one? That might explain why everyone was so pleasant and why it seems to have been closed.
I still remember my first starbucks visit as a 13 y.o. Sitting down, having a coffee, not knowing what caffeine was, and having the best conversation of my life.
The calories!
The next iteration might be whoever builds the Starbucks of boba tea.
It was the case since forever ( ~15 years+ ). Starbucks is not a speciality coffee shop. There is nothing wrong with that. One has to acknowledge that high volume coffee shops have to rely on basically burned beans in order to be consistent with the taste.
Over roasted coffee averages the flavor across large harvests and sources, and they expect to dump a bunch of sugar in there anyway.
You can order exactly as much sugar as you want for their drinks. If you order a Cappuccino with milk or a coffee or Americano, there isn't any sugar in any of the drinks.
I've taken that approach and think it's sound advice.
The Starbucks's near me in Canada are fine. If they get rid of the long line of mobile order people, they'd be pretty fine.
When are small coffee shops going to understand, if you have a 1 hour limit on how long I can sit there on my laptop (if you even allow laptops), I’m not going to go to your shop. Coffee doesn’t matter, it’s all the same shit.
Starbucks has never cared if I buy one coffee and then sit there all day.
Top Tip: Easily avoid said sofa-hogging hipsters. Look for the bike rack full of Penny Farthings outside.
Go to a Workday for your 'co-working vibes'. Take your Macbook Air and Crossley portable turntables with you as well.
Sincerely,
All the other coffee shop patrons.
What about patrons with disabilities? Patrons that might want to use the coffee shop to meet someone and talk to them and socialise?
If you want to use a coffee shop as a work hub either a) go to the office, b) work from home or c) go rent office space or visit a work hub.
Some people...
And yet, there’s definitely times where there’s too many people to find a good place to sit and work for a few hours.
Starbucks understands this tension and seems to create sitting areas that are designed for both types of individuals.
Unlike indie coffeeshops which have the same kind of seating for every customer and says fuck you to remote workers if they linger too long.
This is why I just keep going to Starbucks. It’s a rare example of a big corp being less hostile to customers than equivalent small businesses.
I don't think this is categorically true, while many are the same, you can definitely taste the difference between different beans and styles of coffee. A latte is very different to a cold brew, for example! Calling it all the same is very dismissive, and more importantly, inaccurate.
I wrote all that in the past tense because none of the things I liked about starbucks is uniformly available any longer.
I don't really like Starbucks, but I feel a need to defend them that they have earned their success in ways other than marketing.
That was the case where I live for the longest time. Starbucks wasn't great, but it was a pretty big step above McDonalds and the others, and the local shops, while great, were way more expensive than Starbucks.
But now that's no longer the case, really. Plenty of local, really good coffee shops here that are now the similar pricing to Starbucks now that Starbucks has been consistently jacking up prices. Starbucks has no right to be asking $15+ for a triple shot 20oz drink when I can get a much better tasting one for the same price at the local shop across the street.
Where Starbucks still won was availability and consistency. They are literally everywhere, open later, and the recipes are so formulaic now that I know exactly what I'm getting no matter which shop I go to.
They do need to go back down in price though and settle back into that happy middle place.
This isn’t something any coffee shop should be serving. It’s like a big gulp 64 ounce soda, it shouldn’t exist.
EDIT Also, I'm pretty sure the better coffee at mcdonalds happened after starbucks, IIRC they put a lot of effort into improving their offering after starbucks exploded
Coffee of, for, and by hipsters. ;O) More power to people who want to take 3 hours to make a cup of coffee like it's a Japanese tea ceremony.
We have other chains here, like Blenz, which are franchised rather than corporate, and the quality is hit or miss. I went to a Blenz location once and got a drink far better than anything else I've had in the city, but most of the time I go there I get something mediocre and poorly-made.
Meanwhile, every latte I get from a Starbucks comes out of an automated espresso machine but it comes out pretty much the same every time. The pastries are all pre-packaged and made at some industrial kitchen probably not even in the same time zone, but, again, they're the same every time. And especially when my son was a baby, my wife and I got into the habit of going to Starbucks very frequently because it was one of the only retail anything that always had changing tables in the bathroom, and, if they had gendered washrooms, always had a changing table in the men's room as well. Every other place was hit or miss, and it didn't take long before I got tired of changing my son on (a changing mat on) a filthy bathroom floor.
Back to drinks, though, there are a lot of other small, independent cafes around, and smaller chains like Artigiano which give you better coffee (or pastries or tea or ...), but they're a lot less commonly found.
Now, all that being said, I would kick a (picture of) a puppy if I could get a Te & Kaffi location in Vancouver; the instant I walked into one for the first time in Iceland it reminded me why I originally liked working in a cafe in my twenties - it felt cozy, comfortable, and it smelled deliciously of fresh coffee. It's a lot rarer to get that here for some reason.
> Business owners just couldn’t see the use case for changing stations. Hilger says he was trying to sell the device to “men in their 50s who never changed a diaper in their life.”
> A new brochure — this one depicting a woman on her hands and knees changing her baby’s diaper on a disgusting bathroom floor– did the trick. “We had to make them feel guilty,” Hilger says.
https://fortune.com/2014/08/13/koala-baby-changing-station/
We're a long way from a five gallon jug of coffee that hasn't been cleaned out since 1982.
They served as a pub, in the public house sense, for young professionals.
I think covid really derailed that and the vibe never quite returned. I'm not sure what people are using for a 'third place' (not home or work) these days but Starbucks is out of fashion and sometimes generally hostile to customer loitering now.
They are not hostile to laptops, and overall they have a well-thought out vibe with convenient seating and electricity plugs everywhere
I used to go into smaller coffee shops and it was a 50/50 gamble that I was going to get terrible coffee (though more recently, I've had better luck). At least with Starbucks I knew I was going to get average coffee every single time.
That being said, I make 95% of my coffee at home.
Absolutely. That's why end up going there when I travel and just need to get something quick. I may find a better coffee shop if I have time, or if I wing it, I may end up with some burnt horrible coffee and undercooked sausage (happened before) so I'll just opt to pay more to get the consistency. At home I just brew my own coffee as well.
It's the McDonalds of coffee. There are lot of better restaurants than McDonalads for sure but a random restaurant could also be worse. So McDonalds provides some low common denominator consistency. Same with Starbucks, coffee may not be the best and sandwiches are so so, but you know what you're getting there.
I find myself there when I travel to another city and need to grab something on the go. I could sit down and start researching local coffee shops if I have time, but if don't, I can pop in and out of Starbucks and know exactly what I'll get.
It’s very rare to find a local coffee shop in the U.S. with a drive-thru.
I've been to one in Milan, in the old postoffice building right smack in the middle of the city and it has an astounding selection of coffee styles and very cool ambiance [1].
But, yeah, I agree that regular shops are underwhelming and overpriced by local European norms.
[1] https://www.roastery.starbucks.it/
But everywhere Ive lived (rural New England and now Seattle) there has always been cheaper better coffee available at local shops. It seems that people who like starbucks and people who are into coffee are consumer groups with little crossover
I think they basically developed a quality brand then just gutted the quality everywhere else to expand and it worked.
Zero "partners" are impacted by this. The people impacted are employees.
Also, Starbucks do not operate "coffee houses", they're coffee stores at best, or even just "retail locations".
Edit: I'm too young for this, but it's along the lines of Personnel from the '60s becoming Human Resources in the '70s and '80s, and Human Resources from the '90s and '00s now becoming People Operations in the '10s and '20s.
I suspect in the '30s it'll change again. Maybe one day there will be a culture change towards boring and we'll just call people "customers," "employees," and the departments responsible for hiring the "Hiring Department."
And people will get mad about that, too, because the HD will be responsible for the paperwork required to fire people, too.
Please just call me an employee or engineer. As for "leadership", I am somewhat convinced that the word "management" would lead to a mid-life crisis. Such inflated egos. As for "the brand", they are my employer.
This Newspeak has benefits though. Mainly that it hides in plain sight the top-down hierarchy of power that exists. Despite that fact that some employees are on food stamps while others make millions, it _sounds_ like everyone is on on somewhat equal footing.
Store Closures:
North America coffeehouse count will decline by about 1% in fiscal year 2025 Will end with nearly 18,300 total Starbucks locations (company operated and licensed) across US and Canada
Staff Reductions:
Approximately 900 non-retail partner roles eliminated Additional open non-retail positions closed Store employees (partners) at closing locations will be offered transfers where possible, or severance packages if transfers aren't available
Who's affected:
Non-retail partners (corporate/support roles) - notified Friday morning Retail partners at closing coffeehouses - notified during the week of the announcement
Or do we go for our 1200 calorie 'coffee' milkshake on the way to work every morning?
Starbucks is closing about 1% of its North American stores due to poor performance or unsuitable locations. The company is eliminating approximately 900 corporate/office jobs and closing many open positions in support roles. Store employees at closing locations will be offered transfers to other stores when possible, or severance packages if no transfers are available.