Docker Hub Is Down
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
dockerstatus.comTechstoryHigh profile
heatednegative
Debate
60/100
DockerContainerizationDevops
Key topics
Docker
Containerization
Devops
Docker Hub is experiencing an outage, causing issues with deployments and builds, and prompting discussions about alternatives and caching strategies.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
27m
Peak period
71
0-6h
Avg / period
11.1
Comment distribution100 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 100 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 24, 2025 at 7:15 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 24, 2025 at 7:42 PM EDT
27m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
71 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 28, 2025 at 11:25 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45367085Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:11:42 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I don't work on mission-critical software (nor do I have anyone to answer to) so it's not the end of the world, but has me wondering what my alternate deployment routes are. Is there a mirror registry with all the same basic images? (node/alpine)
I suppose the fact that I didn't notice before says wonderful things about its reliability.
Unfortunately that does not help in an outage because you cannot fill the cache now.
Took me a while to think of checking the docker hub status page.
> wondering what my alternate deployment routes are
If the stakes are low and you don't have any specific need for a persistent registry then you could skip it entirely and push images to production from wherever they are built.
This could be as simple as `docker save`/`scp`/`docker load`, or as fancy as running an ephemeral registry to get layer caching like you have with `docker push`/`docker pull`[1].
[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/79758446/3625
https://gallery.ecr.aws/
I can see an image tag available in the cache in my project on cloud.google.com, but after attempting to pull from the cache (and failing) the image is deleted from GAR :(
> "When a pull is attempted with a tag, the Registry checks the remote to ensure if it has the latest version of the requested content. Otherwise, it fetches and caches the latest content."
So if the authentication service is down, it might also affect the caching service.
Source: I co-founded Quay.io
So far, spelling has been our worst issue with Quay!
But maybe ECR is better than Docker Hub.
There are still some we pull from Docker Hub, especially in the build process of our own images.
To work around that, on AWS, you can prefix the image with public.ecr.aws/docker/library/ for example public.ecr.aws/docker/library/python:3.12 and it will pull from AWS's mirror of Docker Hub.
I believe anyone can pull from the public ecr, not just clients in AWS
https://xkcd.com/303/
for example, i have redis:7.2-alpine in cache, but not golang:1.24.5-alpine
I needed the golang image to start my dev-backend
so i replaced FROM golang:1.24.5-alpine with FROM redis:7.2-alpine, and manually installed golang with apk in the redis container :)
What would be really nice is a system with mutating admission webhooks for pods which kicks off a job to mirror the image to a local registry and then replaces the image reference with the mirrored location.
[0] https://goharbor.io/
https://gallery.ecr.aws/
Basically it's a k3s configured to use a local mirror and that local mirror is running the Zot registry (https://zotregistry.dev/v2.1.8/). It is configured to automatically expired old images so my local hard drive isn't filled up).
I've been using it at home and work for a few years now, might be a bit overkill if you just want a simple registry, but is a really nice tool for anyone who can benefit from the other features.
[0] https://goharbor.io/
https://hub.docker.com/_/registry
Your git provider probably also has a container registry service built in.
We chose to move to GitLab's container registry for all the images we use. It's pretty easy to do and I'm glad we did. We used to only use it for our own builds.
The package registry is also nice. I only wish they would get out of the "experimental" status for apt mirror support.
Also, isn't it weird that it takes so long to fix given the magnitude of the issue? Already down for 3 hours.