Meshtastic 64 – a Meshtastic Radio for the Commodore 64
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
64jim64.blogspot.comTechstory
excitedpositive
Debate
20/100
MeshtasticCommodore 64Retro ComputingLora Radios
Key topics
Meshtastic
Commodore 64
Retro Computing
Lora Radios
A user has created a Meshtastic radio for the Commodore 64, sparking discussion about the Meshtastic project, its capabilities, and potential applications, as well as nostalgia for retro computing.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
31
Day 4
Avg / period
10.5
Comment distribution42 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 42 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 23, 2025 at 7:54 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 27, 2025 at 5:36 AM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
31 comments in Day 4
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 2, 2025 at 11:49 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45354404Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:50:34 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
That combination is toxic for a high amount of parallel users.
I think it would need big modifications: fast uplink and robust slow downlink.
5w ISS contacts are hard enough as it is
APRS is much more extensive and even available via commercial ham radio
- They want to make device telemetry opt-in. This will cause the network to be more quiet
- A few patches ended up in master for handling corner cases of their flooding and next-hop routing algorithm
- There's also a merge request ("Add packet replay feature") which maybe can solve the reliability problem
Currently bigger Meshtastic networks are very very unreliable. I almost cannot traceroute a device that is one or two hops away. And our channels are not very saturated (10-20% ChUtil).
We also respect and forward Meshtastic and DisasterRadio packets, but there is currently no reciprocity. What can be done about it?
At time of writing (2025-09-27, plus or minus a timezone), there does not appear to be any serious attempt to secure application-layer message contents. (At least, not yet)
My hope is that this cool new radio link option will still gain traction and grow and develop without painting itself into a corner, security-wise.
To wit- security hints on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model have improved substantially since my last readthrough.
They are quite possibly one of the most toxic projects right now.
Could you elaborate?
I've only personally tested Meshtastic, and from a technical perspective, it still feels very beta, and I wouldn't put critical communications on it. However, it's a fun introduction to LoRa and long range low power RF, and can be a fun way to communicate much like I think amateur radio was to its early adopters.
I think one thing that causes a lot of community strangeness is the strong push by some to make it what it's not, like some doomsday-proof communication system that will outlive cellular networks and atomic bombs. It could be useful but requires skilled operators and coordination to work well (like using different frequencies and coding at events for much more bandwidth).
Meshcore is MIT licensed. And closed source applications already started to creep in. See the smartphone apps and the T-Echo implementation. This has already the classic smell of ham radio projects I honestly don't want to support.
The maintainers of MT are friendly. The people using it - not all of them. Like all community driven projects.
But I've seen nothing but friendly interactions on the SF bay mesh which is much larger and thriving.
Nothing seemed particularly toxic, not on either of these meshes. Considering it's an open system anyone can say anything on, I'm sure it'll devolve into chaos as it gets more popular.
But when it comes to toxicity I'm going to assume you're either referring to the Discord, or making shit up. Discord having its roots in gamers is known to be a dumpster fire and I expect nothing less than toxic behavior on any Discord "server".
I do not understand why people spend time on Discord to play with Meshtastic though. Play with the mesh, that's the whole point.
Is there an assembly application planned or will it be basic for now?
Or 169MHz if meshtastic supports it? Edit: Seems no, sadge.
If you add EU freq. I will buy!
Would like to figure out Meshtastic on the Apple II as well!
It’s like a way less fun ham radio.
Welcome to Hacker News!
[0]: https://meshtastic.org/