'sim Farms' Are a Spam Plague. a Giant One in Ny Threatened Us Infrastructure
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
wired.comTechstory
calmnegative
Debate
0/100
Sim FarmsInfrastructure SecurityTelecom SecurityFraud Prevention
Key topics
Sim Farms
Infrastructure Security
Telecom Security
Fraud Prevention
A large 'SIM farm' in New York, potentially threatening US infrastructure, was discovered and reported by the authorities, highlighting concerns around telecom security and fraud.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
48m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 23, 2025 at 7:01 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 23, 2025 at 7:48 PM EDT
48m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 24, 2025 at 10:05 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45353925Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 1:10:48 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> all being within 35 miles of midtown Manhattan
Firstly, these are in fixtures that hold 4 or 8x as many SIMs as radios, so they can’t all be online at the same time.
How many SIMs are active ~35 miles of Manhattan?
Crashing the cell network is fear mongering.
Here’s what I think they’re mostly used for: gray market VOIP termination. Get an unlimited plan and charge US call termination at 0.5 cents/minute. There are 44000 minutes in a month so your potential gross revenue is $220. Sure you can’t run it 24/7, but plans are a lot cheaper.
Then get darker:
As youre doing that, charge for premium SMS reception, ie: validating new Uber or Gmail or whatever accounts as the numbers are “fresh”. Then after that, probably SMS spam.
That’s all low bitrate and easy on the towers until you get creative with data. Big companies have no choice but to be more lenient on mobile traffic because it’s all CG-NAT’d. You can’t do IP bans unless you want to block entire providers and block legit users.