Farmers in Deep-Red Pennsylvania Struggle to Find Workers
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
politico.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
Farm Labor ShortageImmigration PolicyPennsylvania
Key topics
Farm Labor Shortage
Immigration Policy
Pennsylvania
Farmers in deep-red Pennsylvania struggle to find workers due to labor shortages, sparking debate on immigration policy and wages; commenters criticize the article and discuss the complexities of the issue.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
1h
Peak period
7
2-3h
Avg / period
3.5
Comment distribution14 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 14 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 15, 2025 at 1:19 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 15, 2025 at 2:28 PM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 2-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45252404Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 3:47:06 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The lack of mentioning that in a story about the economic impacts of this seems like a deliberate choice to garner more sympathy than "I want to pay people $2 an hour to work" might otherwise. (That is a made up number, I did not go dig up the relevant PA pay rates.)
That seems to cover it in the words of one of the farmers. I personally wouldn't consider the article too sympathetic to them.
Except... a bipartisan fixing bill was nuked on Trump's disapproval shortly before the elections, so that immigration and immigrant status could still be an issue at election time.
Farmers followed up by voting to have all immigrants deported quickly after Inauguration Day. That was clearly communicated.
Farmers FAFO again.
He was apparently conditioned to not believe the person he voted for would follow through on his campaign promises.
For example, someone who thinks that doing a lot of labor is a sign of good moral character might think "deport the lazy criminals" sounds reasonable, and ignore the details which suggest that the crime in their mind is "being foreign", leading to surprise when those you thought of as "good people" are being deported.
(None of that removes the responsibility for the consequences of your actions, of course, just that it's not necessarily that they thought he wouldn't follow through, and more that they only remembered what they wanted to hear.)
Which actually can make sense with competition still on illegal workers, and larger scale competition using prison labor.
Lots of black folks left the South and it's not like they were handing out bags of money in New York.
2 more comments available on Hacker News