First Time Scientists Have Seen Decisionmaking in a Brain
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
wired.comSciencestory
calmpositive
Debate
25/100
NeuroscienceFree WillDecision Making
Key topics
Neuroscience
Free Will
Decision Making
Scientists observe decision-making in a brain for the first time, sparking discussion on implications for free will debates.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 11, 2025 at 10:58 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 11, 2025 at 12:08 PM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 11, 2025 at 12:08 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45212442Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:13:59 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
But if you can credit the physical system with real decision making, e.g. taking in sensory input, modeling the world, weighing alternative incentives, considering consequences, carrying out choices with signals sent out to the limbs, doing it according to your preferences and values, that's a "you" that's making real choices. You can shift the intuition and identify with that. The mental events you experience are you immersed in that process of informational canvassing and deliberating and decision making.
Super determinism treats that like it makes no difference to the ultimate question of determinism. But I think it's in meaningful contrast to characterizations that treat the choices like they're not you, and treat "you" like an epiphenomenon along for the ride. Which is a real distinction. If we can see and model actual deliberations (even if in mice), it seems like that counts in favor of the "you" being in there, in the physical stuff.